2001
DOI: 10.1109/5.939806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-implantable biomimetic electronics as the next era in neural prosthetics

Abstract: An interdisciplinary multilaboratory effort to develop an implantable neural prosthetic that can coexist and bidirectionally communicate with living brain tissue is described. Although the final achievement of such a goal is many years in the future, it is proposed that the path to an implantable prosthetic is now definable, allowing the problem to be solved in a rational, incremental manner. Outlined in this report is our collective progress in developing the underlying science and technology that will enable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Yale researchers pointed out that an important limitation of the technology as it exists now, is that this sort of technology can only read active parts of the brain, not passive memories. A major advance in cyborg technology is the development of a hippocampus prosthesis, which we view as a type of cognitive prosthesis (a prosthesis implanted into the nervous system in order to A major advance in cyborg technology is the development of a hippocampus prosthesis, which we view as a type of cognitive prosthesis (a prosthesis implanted into the nervous system in order to improve or replace the function of damaged brain tissue) [62]. In some cases, prosthetic devices replace the normal function of a damaged body part; this can be simply a structural replacement (e.g., reconstructive surgery) or a rudimentary, functional replacement.…”
Section: Brain Enhancements and Neuroprosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Yale researchers pointed out that an important limitation of the technology as it exists now, is that this sort of technology can only read active parts of the brain, not passive memories. A major advance in cyborg technology is the development of a hippocampus prosthesis, which we view as a type of cognitive prosthesis (a prosthesis implanted into the nervous system in order to A major advance in cyborg technology is the development of a hippocampus prosthesis, which we view as a type of cognitive prosthesis (a prosthesis implanted into the nervous system in order to improve or replace the function of damaged brain tissue) [62]. In some cases, prosthetic devices replace the normal function of a damaged body part; this can be simply a structural replacement (e.g., reconstructive surgery) or a rudimentary, functional replacement.…”
Section: Brain Enhancements and Neuroprosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, prosthetic devices replace the normal function of a damaged body part; this can be simply a structural replacement (e.g., reconstructive surgery) or a rudimentary, functional replacement. As an important cyborg technology, University of Southern California researchers are testing the usefulness of an artificial hippocampus which will mimic the brain's memory center [62]. The device may one-day help those with brain damage, epilepsy, and Alzheimer's disease.…”
Section: Brain Enhancements and Neuroprosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, using the nonparametric PV model, prediction of outputs for a given input pattern only requires simple arithmetical operations such as multiplication and summation. The uniformity and simplicity of model mathematical form is critical for large-scale simulations (Traub and Miles 1991) and hardware implementations (Tsai et al 1998;Berger et al 2001). …”
Section: Parametric Vs Non-parametric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, non-parametric models based on the input-output approach were introduced in the so-called "reduced form" about 20 years ago to offer a comprehensive functional representation of neuronal networks in the hippocampus. 9,10,14,49 More recently, non-parametric models have been used for modeling the input-output relationship in the dentate gyrus 11,7 or in the CA1 region 25 of the hippocampus. A recently accepted paper presents non-parametric models of the separate effects of LPP and MPP stimulation on the granule cell activity but does not examine the nonlinear interactions of the two inputs and their combined effect on granule cell activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%