2005
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.5.0864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain injuries caused by spherical bolts

Abstract: Penetrating spherical bolts to the brain may be lethal. Nevertheless, they have unique ballistics that cause highly delineated anatomical damage and minor neurological deficits.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients had cerebrospinal luid leakage (12.8%) and 40.0% of them were poor outcome and 60.0 % had good outcome &15.4% of the patients had wound infection and 33.3% of them were poor outcome and 66.7% had a good outcome, these were not affected factors, p-value =(1.00), (0.6) respectively as shown in Tables 1 and 2 . There is an obvious male predominance in penetrating injuries to the head with 35 males and 4 females, and it is not a signi icant factor p-value =0.609 even in other studies (Ambrosi et al, 2012). In comparison to other studies done in which they have a nearly equal proportion between male and female (Roth et al, 2005) and this difference because of most our patients were male workers who are prevalent in our community.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The patients had cerebrospinal luid leakage (12.8%) and 40.0% of them were poor outcome and 60.0 % had good outcome &15.4% of the patients had wound infection and 33.3% of them were poor outcome and 66.7% had a good outcome, these were not affected factors, p-value =(1.00), (0.6) respectively as shown in Tables 1 and 2 . There is an obvious male predominance in penetrating injuries to the head with 35 males and 4 females, and it is not a signi icant factor p-value =0.609 even in other studies (Ambrosi et al, 2012). In comparison to other studies done in which they have a nearly equal proportion between male and female (Roth et al, 2005) and this difference because of most our patients were male workers who are prevalent in our community.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The age prevalence was nearly same of 3rd decade (30.8%) and 4th decade (33.3%) which in comparison with other studies the commonest age group is the 2nd decade of life (Roth et al, 2005) or 2nd and 3rd (Roberto et al 2003). And this difference because of our country conditions and most of the male workers are in 3rd and 4th decade of life.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 45%