2020
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain-Machine Neurofeedback: Robotics or Electrical Stimulation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, we hypothesized that the use of a robotic arm exoskeleton at different speeds could enhance cortical rhythms which could facilitate the classification of upper limb KMI tasks. An adequate classification score and False Positive Rate were found, considering the literature reports [31][32][33]36]. Considering the working principle of CSPbased methods [19], our results suggest that information in the time domain cannot be fully discriminatory when the KMI is under different conditions, which is a limitation for spatial filtering methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, we hypothesized that the use of a robotic arm exoskeleton at different speeds could enhance cortical rhythms which could facilitate the classification of upper limb KMI tasks. An adequate classification score and False Positive Rate were found, considering the literature reports [31][32][33]36]. Considering the working principle of CSPbased methods [19], our results suggest that information in the time domain cannot be fully discriminatory when the KMI is under different conditions, which is a limitation for spatial filtering methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This proposal also used constant velocity during the protocol, which may limit the scope. Guggenberg et al implemented a strategy to classify KMI from EEG signals in a protocol that employed a robotic hand orthosis and a functional electrical stimulator [36]. This approach reached an accuracy rate above 0.6 using information from the Beta (β) band.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non-invasive brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) allow the transmission of volitional cortical commands to control rehabilitative devices ( Wolpaw et al, 2002 ; López-Larraz et al, 2018b ; Guggenberger et al, 2020 ). For instance, there is ample evidence demonstrating contingent EEG control of robotic exoskeletons with patients ( Ramos-Murguialday et al, 2013 ; López-Larraz et al, 2018a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%