2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63327-9.00005-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Plasticity in the Developing Brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
268
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
8
268
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, with this subject sample, the NFB program was more effective than VP or no training in improving attentional ability. These findings could be explained using a theory of brain plasticity, stating that a practical training method targeting brainwave changes could improve the arousal regulation of the brain and consequently influence attentional ability (Kolb & Gibb, 2011). The NFB group showed improved selective attention, attention span, and automatic reaction inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with this subject sample, the NFB program was more effective than VP or no training in improving attentional ability. These findings could be explained using a theory of brain plasticity, stating that a practical training method targeting brainwave changes could improve the arousal regulation of the brain and consequently influence attentional ability (Kolb & Gibb, 2011). The NFB group showed improved selective attention, attention span, and automatic reaction inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to current evidence brain functions in their developmental stages are particularly vulnerable to postnatal developmental deficits that likely may have various etiological backgrounds (Teicher, Tomoda, & Andersen, 2006;Fagiolini, Jensen, & Champagne, 2009;Kolb & Gibb, 2011) and may cause persisting of the so-called primitive reflexes (Allen & Capute, 1986;Zafeiriou, 2004;Sanders & Gillig, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second issue D raises with the neuroscientific arguments for UG is that 'the local connectivity in the language areas (as well as other areas of the brain) [is] not genetically specified but emerge[s] as a result of activity and [its] position in the larger functional networks in the brain (Elman et al, 1996;Müller, 2009;Anderson et al, 2011;Kolb & Gibb, 2011)' (p.6).…”
Section: Neuroscience Of Languagementioning
confidence: 99%