2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain state-dependent dynamic functional connectivity patterns in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They came to the conclusion that dynamic changes in brain FC may better help to explain the pathophysiology of ADHD. Sun et al ( 2021 ) suggested state-dependent dynamic changes in large-scale brain connections and network topologies in ADHD. Yang et al ( 2021 ) found that children with ADHD have more unstable dFC of the amygdala subregions, which may impact their cognitive skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They came to the conclusion that dynamic changes in brain FC may better help to explain the pathophysiology of ADHD. Sun et al ( 2021 ) suggested state-dependent dynamic changes in large-scale brain connections and network topologies in ADHD. Yang et al ( 2021 ) found that children with ADHD have more unstable dFC of the amygdala subregions, which may impact their cognitive skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, several studies have found abnormal dFC in ADHD patients. For example, a recent study found that patients with ADHD had significantly changed dFC of the cingulo-opercular network and sensorimotor network (Sun et al, 2021). Another research reported that the default-mode and task-positive networks in people with ADHD exhibit a quasiperiodic clustering recurrence pattern during the entire rs-fMRI scan, suggesting that dFC alterations in people with ADHD may be a neuroimaging marker for ADHD (Kaboodvand et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult to avoid the decrease of accuracy in the independent dataset because we did not do more work related to feature engineering (using only functional connectivity), our method still has a greater advantage over the features constructed by the original RSNs. In addition, features based on RINs and ANs, such as dynamic functional connectivity ( Sun et al, 2021 ), dynamic brain fluctuations ( Moguilner et al, 2021 ), or combined with non-image information features ( Riaz et al, 2018 ), are expected to lead to better diagnostic results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%