2022
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2021.3100758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Tumor Classification Using Fine-Tuned GoogLeNet Features and Machine Learning Algorithms: IoMT Enabled CAD System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manually designing robust features for ML algorithms can be very demanding and time-consuming. Therefore, some studies [ 13 , 14 , 84 ] used deep features to build brain tumor classification models. Deep features refer to features that are extracted from CNN models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Manually designing robust features for ML algorithms can be very demanding and time-consuming. Therefore, some studies [ 13 , 14 , 84 ] used deep features to build brain tumor classification models. Deep features refer to features that are extracted from CNN models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results reported in the literature show that classical ML algorithms trained on deep features outperformed pre-trained models. For example, results reported by Sekhar et al [ 14 ] show that GoogleNet produced precision and specificity of 96.02% and 96.00%, respectively using the softmax classifier. The results also show that the performance of GoogleNet was improved by over 2.5% and 2.3% when SVM and k-NN classifiers were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations