2021
DOI: 10.1057/s41262-021-00248-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brands as personal narratives: learning from user–YouTube–brand interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(113 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, a substantial portion of the literature already investigated the perspective of viewers (Gawer & Cusumano, 2014; Gal‐Or et al, 2018; McIntyre & Srinivasan, 2017), as well as advertisers (e.g., Hanna et al, 2011; Lee & Watkins, 2016; Sashittal & Jassawalla, 2022; Smith et al, 2012; Verhellen & De Pelsmacker, 2013). On the contrary, with the notable exception of Susarla et al (2012) and Bergvall‐Kåreborn and Howcroft (2014), the scant literature on content creators as complementors does not contribute to our understanding of how they exploit over time the digital platform.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, a substantial portion of the literature already investigated the perspective of viewers (Gawer & Cusumano, 2014; Gal‐Or et al, 2018; McIntyre & Srinivasan, 2017), as well as advertisers (e.g., Hanna et al, 2011; Lee & Watkins, 2016; Sashittal & Jassawalla, 2022; Smith et al, 2012; Verhellen & De Pelsmacker, 2013). On the contrary, with the notable exception of Susarla et al (2012) and Bergvall‐Kåreborn and Howcroft (2014), the scant literature on content creators as complementors does not contribute to our understanding of how they exploit over time the digital platform.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing interest in the scientific community, all these topics have been studied primarily from the perspective of the platform owner, also known as the ‘keystone firm’ (Cennamo et al, 2018), and what the platform owner should do in order to successfully manage its network and generate profits (Kim et al, 2017). Additionally, a relevant amount of extant research already examined advertisers' and viewers' perspectives (Gawer & Cusumano, 2014; Gal‐Or et al, 2018; McIntyre & Srinivasan, 2017; Smith et al, 2012; Sashittal & Jassawalla, 2022; Lee & Watkins, 2016; Verhellen & De Pelsmacker, 2013; Hanna et al, 2011). When these complementary actors are considered, the emphasis is on how they can increase their innovation capabilities through the platform ecosystem (Boudreau, 2010; Parker & van Alstyne, 2017; Wareham et al, 2014), how they act as a source of external knowledge (Eckhardt et al, 2018; Kapoor & Agarwal, 2017; Srinivasan & Venkatraman, 2018), and how they spur the platform's growth potential through complementary products or services (Anderson et al, 2014; Venkatraman, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been associated with major societal impacts [2], triggering a debate on whether or not the personalization brings users on radicalization paths [3,4]. To a less extreme end, the problem of users getting a narrow view on the possibilities offered by the platforms has been studied qualitatively under the terms of filter bubbles [5][6][7], and more recently the rabbit-hole (shorthanded RH through the paper) phenomenon [4,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have the capacity and capability to produce content on any topic or category. However, not all content posted on video platforms such as YouTube gets the desired attention, and only a fraction can reach a large audience, particularly the videos posted by social media marketers expecting millions of views [4][5][6][7][8]. Companies want to identify these categories with the highest potential for a high number of views on the platform, thereby maximizing profit while considering parameters affecting the quality and timeliness of video production and publishing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%