2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BRCA1–2 mutations in breast cancer: Identification of nine new variants of BRCA1–2 genes in a population from central Western Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
16
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These percentages are slightly closer to those described for other sections of the Spanish population studied [15]. In addition, although we only studied 3 families with previous history of MBC, 2 of these (66.66%) had mutations in BRCA2, which agrees with the findings of other authors [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These percentages are slightly closer to those described for other sections of the Spanish population studied [15]. In addition, although we only studied 3 families with previous history of MBC, 2 of these (66.66%) had mutations in BRCA2, which agrees with the findings of other authors [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These two disease causing germline mutations were identiWed in 2.08% [2/96] of breast/breast ovarian cancer families analyzed. This mutation frequency is in agreement with previous reports in other populations (Chen et al 1998;Yazici et al 2000;Salazar et al 2006). But studies on several other populations had reported comparatively higher pathogenic mutation frequencies for BRCA2 gene (Austria 8% by Wagner et al 1999;Dutch 12% by Peelen et al 2000;Germany 12% by Hamann et al 2002; Portuguese 7% by Peixoto et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We compared the results of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing previously reported in seven different areas of Spain: Galicia (North West) [5], Salamanca (West) [8], Castilla-León (North West-central) [9], Basque Country (North) [10], Aragón (North East) [11], Catalonia (North East-Mediterranean) [12], and Valencia (East) [13] ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation analyses were done using a combination of different screening methods followed by sequencing of samples with abnormal patterns: SSCP (single strand conformation polymorphism) [5], CSGE (conformationalsensitive gel electrophoresis) [8,10], CSGE or fluorescent HA-CAE (heteroduplex analysis with capillary array electrophoresis [9], DHPLC (denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography) [11], and direct sequencing [12]. The analyses included screening of the entire sequence of both genes or at least up the identification of a clear deleterious mutation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%