2003
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0527:bicdle]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown in Correlations During Laboratory Evolution. I. Comparative Analyses of Drosophila Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, this is consistent with the existence of more than one solution for how to cope with starvation conditions. This parallels the interpretations of other authors working on longevity (Harshman et al 1999a;Arking et al 2000;Archer et al 2003;Phelan et al 2003). However, these latter conclusions were based on longer periods after selection.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, this is consistent with the existence of more than one solution for how to cope with starvation conditions. This parallels the interpretations of other authors working on longevity (Harshman et al 1999a;Arking et al 2000;Archer et al 2003;Phelan et al 2003). However, these latter conclusions were based on longer periods after selection.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysissupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In pursuit of the validity of this latter theory, reproduction late in life was found to increase longevity considerably (Rose 1984). However, the correlated responses to selection can disappear when selection is either relaxed for longevity (Vermeulen and Bijlsma 2006), or continued over long periods in the case of correlations between starvation resistance and longevity Phelan et al 2003). The reasons for this can be diverse and may include genotype-by-environment effects and changed selection regimes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand there was an increase in egg size in the Short Larval Time line. These contradictory results allow no firm conclusions about the genetic correlation between development time and egg size; it appears to depend on the specific selection regime or its longer-term stability (note the considerable difference in selection history between egg size and development time lines, see Materials and methods; see also Phelan et al, 2003). However, the fact that genetic correlations may break down given enough time does not explain why there is at least a trend towards the expected direction in the older Short and Long Larval Time lines, but not in the much younger Large and Small Egg Size lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When r MF is high, sexual selection on a trait in males (i.e., a sexual trait that functions in competition for mates) will affect the phenotypic means of both sexes, and this process will continue until net selection on males is balanced by opposing viability selection on females, with neither sex at its phenotypic optimum. Although Lande treated r MF as a constant, it is clear that genetic correlations can evolve under selection (Cheverud 1984;Archer et al 2003;Phelan et al 2003). By showing that r MF impedes the evolution of sexual dimorphism, the work of Lande and Fisher establishes r MF as a target of selection on genetic architecture (i.e., the genetic basis of the mapping between genotype and phenotype) of traits subject to intralocus sexual conflict.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%