2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5333-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking silence: a survey of barriers to goals of care discussions from the perspective of oncology practitioners

Abstract: BackgroundCancer is the leading cause of death in the developed world, and yet healthcare practitioners infrequently discuss goals of care (GoC) with hospitalized cancer patients. We sought to identify barriers to GoC discussions from the perspectives of staff oncologists, oncology residents, and oncology nurses.MethodsThis was a single center survey of staff oncologists, oncology residents, and inpatient oncology nurses. Barriers to GoC discussions were assessed on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = extremely unimpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also a number of organisational factors that could contribute to better communication of prognosis. These include allowing sufficient time to discuss prognosis, allowing patients to ask questions [96], better integration of oncology with palliative care [97], and support for clinicians through encouragement of reflective practice [98].…”
Section: Content Of Prognostic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also a number of organisational factors that could contribute to better communication of prognosis. These include allowing sufficient time to discuss prognosis, allowing patients to ask questions [96], better integration of oncology with palliative care [97], and support for clinicians through encouragement of reflective practice [98].…”
Section: Content Of Prognostic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es fällt ihnen zudem schwer, die Bereitschaft ihrer Patienten für solche Gespräche einzuschätzen, und sie sorgen sich, ihnen mit diesen Gesprächen zu schaden und ihnen Hoffnung zu nehmen [18,21,22]. In aktuellen Befragungen sahen Ärzte die entscheidenden Hindernisse für Diskussion von Therapiezielen in Barrieren ihrer schwer kranken Patienten und deren Angehöriger, insbesondere in der fehlenden Akzeptanz einer schlechten Prognose [23,24].…”
Section: Merkeunclassified
“…Instead the perceived patients and their families did not accept their own poor prognosis. [43,44] Providers also describe inherent difficult in discussing ACP and advance directives with patients pursuing curative therapies, research describes this phenomenon in patients awaiting both solid organ and bone marrow transplants. [45,46] The description of ACP barriers described by clinicians has recurring themes of poor understanding of prognosis, ignorance of the limitations of life-sustaining therapies, and lack of capacity to understand goals of care conversations on the part of patients, families, and caregivers.…”
Section: Gaps In Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45,46] The description of ACP barriers described by clinicians has recurring themes of poor understanding of prognosis, ignorance of the limitations of life-sustaining therapies, and lack of capacity to understand goals of care conversations on the part of patients, families, and caregivers. [43,44,47] Ironically, this is not likely the result of poor understanding by patients and their families regarding the role of ACP and use of advance directives. This is the result of initiating ACP too late in course of a chronic and eventual terminal illness.…”
Section: Gaps In Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%