2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00145-022-09435-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking the Decisional Diffie–Hellman Problem for Class Group Actions Using Genus Theory: Extended Version

Abstract: In this paper, we use genus theory to analyze the hardness of the decisional Diffie-Hellman problem for ideal class groups of imaginary quadratic orders acting on sets of elliptic curves through isogenies (DDH-CGA). Such actions are used in the Couveignes-Rostovtsev-Stolbunov protocol and in CSIDH. Concretely, genus theory equips every imaginary quadratic order O with a set of assigned characters χ : cl(O) → {±1}, and for each such character and every secret ideal class [a] connecting two public elliptic curve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…isogeny key encapsulation (SIKE), a key encapsulation mechanism based on SIDH, was selected as an alternative candidate for NIST PQC standardization round three. However, due to a polynomial-time key recovery attack by Castryck and Decru, SIDH-based cryptosystems are no longer safe [11]. Although various masking methods are presented in [8], [10], and [9], masked variants of SIDH are not yet attractive in terms of performance and key size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…isogeny key encapsulation (SIKE), a key encapsulation mechanism based on SIDH, was selected as an alternative candidate for NIST PQC standardization round three. However, due to a polynomial-time key recovery attack by Castryck and Decru, SIDH-based cryptosystems are no longer safe [11]. Although various masking methods are presented in [8], [10], and [9], masked variants of SIDH are not yet attractive in terms of performance and key size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%