2006
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2006010104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking the Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck Through Conversational Knowledge Management

Abstract: Much of today's organizational knowledge still exists outside of formal information repositories and often only in people's heads. While organizations are eager to capture this knowledge, existing acquisition methods are not up to the task. Neither traditional artificial intelligencebased approaches nor more recent, less-structured knowledge management techniques have overcome the knowledge acquisition challenges. This article investigates knowledge acquisition bottlenecks and proposes the use of collaborative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies involving technology innovation acceptance have provided empirical evidence supporting the influence of various factors, examples of ineffective implementation still exist [14,68]. This research indicates that consideration of the perceived characteristics of innovating together with reciprocity expectation and personal innovativeness is important for organizations contemplating the implementation of KMS.…”
Section: Key Findings and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although several studies involving technology innovation acceptance have provided empirical evidence supporting the influence of various factors, examples of ineffective implementation still exist [14,68]. This research indicates that consideration of the perceived characteristics of innovating together with reciprocity expectation and personal innovativeness is important for organizations contemplating the implementation of KMS.…”
Section: Key Findings and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The addition of knowledge representation and maintenance features of wiki technology allows for more effective knowledge sharing [68]. Wikis also facilitate knowledge searching and filtering activities that are made possible by linking and indexing capabilities.…”
Section: Wiki Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wikis may form suitable platforms to support identification, acquisition, development, distribution, preservation, and use of knowledge within the enterprise, which are the 'knowledge management building blocks' of Probst et al (2000). As most of the organizational knowledge resides in people's heads, collaborative conversational knowledge management tools including wikis may help to widen the bottleneck of knowledge acquisition (Wagner 2006). Besides wikis and traditional weblogs, two further applications are currently gaining importance: social networking services (DiMicco et al 2008;Richter and Koch 2008;Richter and Riemer 2009) and microblogging services (Riemer and Richter 2010;Zhang et al 2010; Barnes et al 2010;Mueller and Stocker 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, since expertise is inescapably narrow, the experts of a specialized unit can focus only on a few aspects of knowledge and not on something as broad as the whole organizational information. Furthermore, expert consultancy may be accompanied by high latency in knowledge acquisition [75]. This is due to the fact that in hierarchical-based coordination, experts perform either isolated or in the limits of their specialized functional units and the necessary combination of knowledge is performed by moving up the hierarchy [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%