2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking the matching in nested case–control data offered several advantages for risk estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(208 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All analyses to estimate the association of the biomarkers with breast cancer risk were conducted on the population of the placebo group rst with conditional logistic models and then with Cox proportional hazards models, in which the dependent variable is the couple ("breast cancer event"; "time to event"). To break the matching between the cases and their controls and e ciently include the time dimension in the investigation of the association between exposures (baseline BMI and adiponectin increase) and outcome (breast cancer event), a weighted Cox regression analysis was employed [19]. To obtain inferences for the full placebo cohort, the women included in the analysis were up-weighted using the Borgan II weights approach [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All analyses to estimate the association of the biomarkers with breast cancer risk were conducted on the population of the placebo group rst with conditional logistic models and then with Cox proportional hazards models, in which the dependent variable is the couple ("breast cancer event"; "time to event"). To break the matching between the cases and their controls and e ciently include the time dimension in the investigation of the association between exposures (baseline BMI and adiponectin increase) and outcome (breast cancer event), a weighted Cox regression analysis was employed [19]. To obtain inferences for the full placebo cohort, the women included in the analysis were up-weighted using the Borgan II weights approach [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this study design offers the benefit of eliminating the problem of referral or partial verification bias, commonly seen with typical case-control designs. Moreover, this study design also ensured that all the patients who were selected for the study signify a true representation of the actual disease status and act as a standard reference of interest for the study [15,16]. Furthermore, a nested case-control design allows a simple way for obtaining all the measures of diagnostic accuracy for the target sample [16].…”
Section: Study Design and Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 Extensive simulations confirmed that IPW estimators, which break the matching for two-phase designs, are efficient. 26,27…”
Section: Likelihood and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%