2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2018.8621307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification: A Deep Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison with related research. We compared our methods with seven existing CRC detection methods 13,17,35,[38][39][40][41] , and five other cancers (lung, ductal carcinoma, breast, prostate, basal cell carcinoma) detection methods 7,[42][43][44][45] (Supplementary Table 2). The 6 of 7 CRC detection methods had an AUC ranging from 0.904 to 0.99 based on SL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with related research. We compared our methods with seven existing CRC detection methods 13,17,35,[38][39][40][41] , and five other cancers (lung, ductal carcinoma, breast, prostate, basal cell carcinoma) detection methods 7,[42][43][44][45] (Supplementary Table 2). The 6 of 7 CRC detection methods had an AUC ranging from 0.904 to 0.99 based on SL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using another independent set of 10,116 (49.92%) cancer and 10,148 (50.08%) non-cancer patches, the AI for patch-level prediction achieved a testing accuracy of 98.11% and an AUC of 99.83%. The AUC outperformed that of all the previous AI studies for CRC diagnosis and prediction (79.2–99.4%) and even for the majority of other types of cancer (82.9–99.9%, see Additional file 1 : Supplementary-Tables 3, [ 8 , 12 , 17 , 19 , 22 , 43 48 ]). The specificity was 99.22% and the sensitivity 96.99%, both outstanding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For cancer diagnosis, CNN-based DL models have exhibited exceptional accuracy in identifying malignant tumors using histopathology slides [30][31][32][33][34][35]. In an international competition (CAMELYON16) for diagnosing breast cancer metastasis in lymph nodes using WSI with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, the best CNN algorithm (a GoogLeNet architecture-based model) yielded an AUC of 0.994, outperforming the best pathologist with an AUC of 0.884 and in a more time-efficient manner [33].…”
Section: Cancer Diagnosis Classification and Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%