2018
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast cancer histopathology is predictive of low-risk Oncotype Dx recurrence score

Abstract: We question the utility of performing Oncotype Dx in subtypes of invasive carcinoma that are associated with excellent prognosis. We propose that immunohistochemistry for ER, PR, and HER2 is sufficient for patients with low-grade invasive carcinomas and can be used as a surrogate for Oncotype Dx.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Far less patients within the ILC population have a high RS (only 6.6% vs 16.0% of those within the IDC population). These findings are concordant with those from earlier studies indicating that patients with ILC have a lower mean RS than those with IDC and a lower percentage with a high RS (range, 1%‐8%) 15‐19,28‐33 . We also observed that, among patients with ILC, those with a higher RS were more likely to be treated with CT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Far less patients within the ILC population have a high RS (only 6.6% vs 16.0% of those within the IDC population). These findings are concordant with those from earlier studies indicating that patients with ILC have a lower mean RS than those with IDC and a lower percentage with a high RS (range, 1%‐8%) 15‐19,28‐33 . We also observed that, among patients with ILC, those with a higher RS were more likely to be treated with CT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings are concordant with those from earlier studies indicating that patients with ILC have a lower mean RS than those with IDC and a lower percentage with a high RS (range, 1%-8%). [15][16][17][18][19][28][29][30][31][32][33] We also observed that, among patients with ILC, those with a higher RS were more likely to be treated with CT. This finding is in agreement with the findings of Chen et al, who analyzed 6467 patients with ILC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…and proliferation genes assessed in the ODX assay. 32,34 Almost all low grade, LN-breast cancers are ER+/PR+/HER2-35 and consequently are eligible for ODX testing according to international guidelines. 11,12 "Classical" invasive lobular cancer (ILC)(ER+/PR+, low grade), in particular is molecularly identified as Luminal A intrinsic subtype of tumor and except for the pleomorphic variant, ILC has low to intermediate RS.…”
Section: Oncological Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HER2, luminal B), while OncotypeDx was not prognostic in this dataset. In fact, several papers have pointed to the limited value in ILC patients, with recent SEER dataset analyses showing that OncotypeDx offers little value above standard histopathology in ILC and other low-risk subtypes; 31,49 many recent studies concede that the relevance of OncotypeDx ILC requires further study. 28,29,50 Overall, LobSig appears to have increased value than existing signatures in the lobular context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The clinical utility in ILC of the 21-gene signature, OncotypeDx®, remains unclear with two studies showing classification of 42% 28 and 35.5% 29 of patients as being as of intermediate risk (IR; managing the IR designated patient is clinically challenging 30 ) and further studies indicate limited additional value over histology. 31 Prosigna® is the commercial diagnostic test based on the PAM50 ‘intrinsic’ subtyping. It generates a Risk of Recurrence score (ROR) and has a better prognostic value than that of the OncotypeDx test, in ER+ node negative patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%