2000
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn38703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Cancer: Importance of Spiculation in Computer-aided Detection

Abstract: Spiculation was clearly present in a majority (55%) of consecutive screening-detected breast cancer masses found on mammograms in a large clinical trial. Incorporation of spiculation measures is, therefore, an important strategy in the detection of breast cancer with CAD. A present-generation CAD algorithm correctly identified a large proportion (86%) of spiculated breast cancers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previously developed computer schemes that detect and classify spiculated and nonspiculated masses [18][19][20][21], our scheme uses a simple summary index to quantify spiculation levels of any suspected masses. As do most of current CAD schemes, our scheme used the low-resolution image to define the initial boundary contour of a suspected mass, thereby reducing image noise and increasing the computation efficiency of the region growth algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike previously developed computer schemes that detect and classify spiculated and nonspiculated masses [18][19][20][21], our scheme uses a simple summary index to quantify spiculation levels of any suspected masses. As do most of current CAD schemes, our scheme used the low-resolution image to define the initial boundary contour of a suspected mass, thereby reducing image noise and increasing the computation efficiency of the region growth algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visualized spiculation level of mass boundary has been well recognized as an important factor in classification between malignant and benign masses [18]. Several techniques have been developed and tested to detect and classify between spiculated and non-spiculated masses [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spiculated masses carry a much higher risk of malignancy than calcifications or other types of masses. The performance figures for the leading mass detection algorithms are not as good as those for microcalcification detection algorithms [7]. Masses appear as ill-defined local increases in brightness, are highly variable in appearance, and share many characteristics with normal background tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Masses appear as ill-defined local increases in brightness, are highly variable in appearance, and share many characteristics with normal background tissue. Almost 50% of malignant masses are, however, characterized by a radial pattern of linear structures known as spicules [7,8]. In this paper, we present a computational technique that detects the spiculations in masses in ultrasound images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Detecting spiculation as a part of mass region is thus essential for further computer analysis. In this task, a steerable ridge detection approach 22 was employed and it was further generalized into a multiscale analysis framework to detect the presence of spiculations.…”
Section: Iib3 Spiculation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%