2015
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392015000300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding rootstocks for Prunus species: Advances in genetic and genomics of peach and cherry as a model

Abstract: Prunus rootstock is an important choice in optimizing productivity of grafted cultivars. Nevertheless, many Prunus rootstocks are notoriously intolerant to hypoxia which is caused by waterlogging and/or heavy soils. There is no available information to help select Prunus rootstocks that are tolerant to stress conditions such as root hypoxia caused by excess moisture. Information from genetic maps has demonstrated a high level of synteny among Prunus species, and this suggests that they all share a similar geno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, choosing the most appropriate sweet cherry rootstock proved to be essential, the priority being given to their compatibility with the majority of cultivars in use as well as the adaptability to different agro-ecological conditions [20]. An ideal rootstock should provide a better anchorage and induce good tree survival, high annual yields and acceptable fruit color and size [21,22]. Rootstocks should also restrict the scion vigor in order to enable the tree to adapt to adverse soil conditions (pH, drought, texture, drainage) as well as to increase tolerance to biotic (nematodes, insects, diseases) and abiotic (e.g., water deficit, salinity, low temperatures) stress factors [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, choosing the most appropriate sweet cherry rootstock proved to be essential, the priority being given to their compatibility with the majority of cultivars in use as well as the adaptability to different agro-ecological conditions [20]. An ideal rootstock should provide a better anchorage and induce good tree survival, high annual yields and acceptable fruit color and size [21,22]. Rootstocks should also restrict the scion vigor in order to enable the tree to adapt to adverse soil conditions (pH, drought, texture, drainage) as well as to increase tolerance to biotic (nematodes, insects, diseases) and abiotic (e.g., water deficit, salinity, low temperatures) stress factors [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, physiological and molecular markers are important in assisting rootstock breeding programs. These aspects are analyzed by Morales-Olmedo et al (2015) and Guajardo et al (2015), respectively.…”
Section: The Importance Of Rootstock/scion Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using information from genetic maps, a high level of synteny has been demonstrated among Prunus species, and this suggests that they all share a similar genomic structure. Applying methods to identify regions of the genome involved in the expression of important traits, Guajardo et al (2015) show that it is possible to identify genetic determinants involved in tolerance to abiotic stresses and other traits in Prunus rootstocks. In her article, Guajardo provides insights on the advances in the development of molecular markers for use in marker-assisted selection (MAS) in Prunus species.…”
Section: Assisted Selection In Rootstocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these agronomic traits are a consequence of differences in the root system architecture or the hydraulic properties of a rootstock, which contribute in influencing the transpiration rate through their effects on the stem water potential ( stem ) and the control of stomatal conductance (Hernandez-Santana et al, 2016). On the other hand, the development of markers to help select individuals with traits that are complex to evaluate should speed up the development of new rootstocks that are resistant or tolerant to multiple biotic or abiotic stresses (Cantini et al, 2001;Arismendi et al, 2012;Jiménez et al, 2013;Guajardo et al, 2015). However, the types of methodology required for this remain fairly timeconsuming, costly and, in some cases, are still scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%