Brexit, Trump and trade: Back to a late 19th century future?

Abstract

<jats:p> There are striking similarities between today’s early 21st century trade political economy and its late 19th century equivalent. Ascendant populist nationalism, escalating trade protectionism and tariff wars, growing discontent over globalization’s distributional impacts and fast emerging economic superpowers disrupting the global order are features shared by both periods. This comparative historical analysis explores what lessons and conclusions we may draw from the past late 19th century world that can be applied to today. Integral to this discussion are the prospects of our early 21st century world experiencing a similar endgame of global conflict, as transpired around a century ago. In revisiting the past to better understand the present and future, this paper first evaluates empirical similarities between the trade political economies of both periods. It then applies theories and concepts of economic nationalism, globalization and interdependence in developing deeper conclusions and arguments. Brexit, Trump and their historic parallels serve as primary focal points in this study. </jats:p>

Technological and educational challenges towards pandemic-resilient aviation

“…Right now, airlines are pushing towards reopening; the major driver is not connecting the world, but rather getting back to business as usual (and profit as usual) as soon as possible. There need to be clearly wider efforts to hinder the establishment of excessive nationalism ( Edgerton, 2007 ; Dent, 2020 ). We think that the aviation community should be a role model, and its workforce should contribute towards the containment of the biological as well as the political virus.…”

Systemic Transformations and Chinese Image of the World Order: Transcending Great Wall Through Neo-Confucianism and Tianxia Systems

“…The effectiveness of any order can be calculated from effectiveness and efficiency of its founding principles. The European order that followed Napoleonic wars came to end when it failed to guarantee balance of power, and when its principles were scrapped (Agensky, 2017;Dent, 2020).…”

Economic structure, power and institutions: A conceptual framework for analysing the historical transformation of US industrial strategy

“…Concrete protectionist actions have been implemented against the US’s main trade partners, including the EU, Canada, Mexico and China. These neoprotectionist actions have undoubtedly activated a spiral of reactions from such trade partners, reducing international trade flows (Dent, 2020), later further limited by the coronavirus emergency.…”