2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge helix bending promotes RNA polymerase II backtracking through a critical and conserved threonine residue

Abstract: The dynamics of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) backtracking process is poorly understood. We built a Markov State Model from extensive molecular dynamics simulations to identify metastable intermediate states and the dynamics of backtracking at atomistic detail. Our results reveal that Pol II backtracking occurs in a stepwise mode where two intermediate states are involved. We find that the continuous bending motion of the Bridge helix (BH) serves as a critical checkpoint, using the highly conserved BH residue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BH GOF variants suppressed strong LOF TL variants Q1078S and H1085Y but failed to suppress, or even exacerbated slightly LOF TL variants H1085Q and F1086S (Fig 6B, 6C and 6E), consistent with conditional epistasis, where GOF activity of BH variants can suppress either specific TL variants or otherwise exert their effects in specific contexts. Finally, recent modeling studies predicted that the BH residue Y836 assists Pol II forward translocation [72] by interacting with the DNA:RNA hybrid. Y836A/H conferred Gal R phenotypes, consistent with LOF and compromised translocation (S10F Fig).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BH GOF variants suppressed strong LOF TL variants Q1078S and H1085Y but failed to suppress, or even exacerbated slightly LOF TL variants H1085Q and F1086S (Fig 6B, 6C and 6E), consistent with conditional epistasis, where GOF activity of BH variants can suppress either specific TL variants or otherwise exert their effects in specific contexts. Finally, recent modeling studies predicted that the BH residue Y836 assists Pol II forward translocation [72] by interacting with the DNA:RNA hybrid. Y836A/H conferred Gal R phenotypes, consistent with LOF and compromised translocation (S10F Fig).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this region is well resolved in EC1/2, it shows weaker density in the OC and is disordered in the cryo-EM structures of monomeric apo Pol and its initiation-competent form (Engel et al., 2016, Pilsl et al., 2016), suggesting that RNA synthesis, rather than closing of the DNA-binding cleft, triggers the complete folding of the BH. Accordingly, this mobile region includes a conserved threonine A190 T1013 (T831 in Pol II-Rpb1 and T879 in Pol III-C160), which has been proposed as a “probe” for DNA/RNA stability and to be important for TFIIS-stimulated RNA cleavage (Da et al., 2016). In the OC, residue T1013 is in a similar position as in apo Pol I, facing away from base position +1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more detailed model would consider different concentrations for different NTPs under physiological conditions and differences in kinetic rates and secondary pore interactions as a function of NTP type and require additional simulation data for parametrization. Moreover, we do not consider backtracking and pausing that is believed to occur in a mismatch-dependent manner [10, 45, 52]. The coupling of pyrophosphate release to Pol II dynamics and a possible interference with NTP entry or exit via the secondary pore was also ignored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model focuses on NTPs but it could be combined with the Pol II-centric kinetic models developed by the Huang group that consider translocation, backtracking and pausing, bridge helix dynamics, and pyrophosphate release [8, 10]. Explicit consideration of translocation, bridge helix dynamics, and pyrophosphate release by itself and possibly coupled with NTP entry would provide a better basis for estimating the A➔C transition rate in contrast to our current model where all of these processes are lumped together with the chemical catalysis step into a single rate that was fit to experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation