Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2993422.2996405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge structural monitoring through a vibration energy harvesting wireless sensor network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The devices were tested at an acceleration level from 0.075 g to 0.6 g and the resonant frequency of these BEHs ranged from 4 to 27 Hz. The load resistance mostly varied in the available literature below 100 Ω but a maximum load resistance of 335 Ω (Gaglione et al, 2018) was also used. The power density for most harvesters is reasonable but the harvester reported by (Hou et al, 2018) has a power density as high as 176.5 µW/cm 3 , which is because of the larger size of the harvester…”
Section: Behs Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The devices were tested at an acceleration level from 0.075 g to 0.6 g and the resonant frequency of these BEHs ranged from 4 to 27 Hz. The load resistance mostly varied in the available literature below 100 Ω but a maximum load resistance of 335 Ω (Gaglione et al, 2018) was also used. The power density for most harvesters is reasonable but the harvester reported by (Hou et al, 2018) has a power density as high as 176.5 µW/cm 3 , which is because of the larger size of the harvester…”
Section: Behs Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for this difference is that the harvesters are tested in-lab at higher acceleration levels and at resonant frequencies under sinusoidal vibrations which are usually not available at the bridge site. For example, the in-lab output power for BEH (Gaglione et al, 2018) was 78.9 mW which was the highest, however, its output average power on the bridge site was only 1 mW. On the bridge site, most of the harvesters were tested for a few min or hrs., however, few harvesters were analyzed (McCullagh et al, 2014; Peigney and Siegert, 2013) for months.…”
Section: Behs Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations