2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-022-0882-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging finite element and deep learning: High-resolution stress distribution prediction in structural components

Abstract: Finite-element analysis (FEA) for structures has been broadly used to conduct stress analysis of various civil and mechanical engineering structures. Conventional methods, such as FEA, provide high fidelity results but require the solution of large linear systems that can be computationally intensive. Instead, Deep Learning (DL) techniques can generate results significantly faster than conventional run-time analysis. This can prove extremely valuable in real-time structural assessment applications. Our propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zong et al [14] used the central composite experimental design method (CCD) and second-order response surface model to update the finite element model based on the health monitoring of a large-span continuous rigid frame bridge, proving that finite element model updating based on a second-order response surface has a high accuracy [15][16][17]. In recent years, finite element modeling and correction technology based on artificial intelligence has attracted more and more attention; for instance, wavelet convolutional neural networks and deep-learning neural networks have been used for wind-induced vibration modeling and stress distribution prediction [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zong et al [14] used the central composite experimental design method (CCD) and second-order response surface model to update the finite element model based on the health monitoring of a large-span continuous rigid frame bridge, proving that finite element model updating based on a second-order response surface has a high accuracy [15][16][17]. In recent years, finite element modeling and correction technology based on artificial intelligence has attracted more and more attention; for instance, wavelet convolutional neural networks and deep-learning neural networks have been used for wind-induced vibration modeling and stress distribution prediction [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test and train correlation results presented in table 1 reveal a positive relationship between the train dataset size and the correlation, confirming the expected trend. The observed increase in correlation with larger dataset sizes highlights the significant impact of dataset size on the model's predictive performance [71]. The model was trained on a system equipped with dual Quadro RTX 5000 GPUs and 128 GB of RAM.…”
Section: Effect Of the Dataset Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process is broken down into three different stages: first, starting to learn reflective feature space using the multiple CNNs through the Cont-RPs of the three frequency varieties; second, incorporating their symmetrical outputs into one incorporated recognition variable; and third, creating class probabilities based on the representation vectors by learning the relationships between them using a fully-connected layer including a nonlinear function. Although our CNNs feature the same structure as the initial portion of the VGG16 model [51], many of the parameters were trained from scratch using the training dataset. Figure 2 shows the overview of the presented CNN framework.…”
Section: Classification and Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%