2009 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isie.2009.5222600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging GPS outages of tightly coupled GPS/SINS based on the Adaptive Track Fusion using RBF neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During DVL malfunctions, the SINS/DVL/MCP/PS integrated navigation system is processed by four different solutions: (1) insulate the faulted DVL measurements without predictor (i.e., the local filter 1 introduced in Section 2.1 only executes the time update process); (2) use only PLSR predictor; (3) use radial basis function (RBF) neural network predictor [34]; (4) use PLSR-SVR hybrid predictor. It is worth noting that the DVL malfunctions listed in the introduction are all short-term, lasting for a few seconds or minutes.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During DVL malfunctions, the SINS/DVL/MCP/PS integrated navigation system is processed by four different solutions: (1) insulate the faulted DVL measurements without predictor (i.e., the local filter 1 introduced in Section 2.1 only executes the time update process); (2) use only PLSR predictor; (3) use radial basis function (RBF) neural network predictor [34]; (4) use PLSR-SVR hybrid predictor. It is worth noting that the DVL malfunctions listed in the introduction are all short-term, lasting for a few seconds or minutes.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neural network predictor [34] Figure 8a shows that, the east and north velocity errors of the system with the first solution increase significantly during the malfunction period, which is due to the lack of external velocity information. By comparison, the systems with the other three predictors work better.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the intention of effectively predicting the vehicle position in free, partial, and full GPS outages based on the Compute the random Gaussian matrix according to (3); (5) ← (6) end for (7) Explore the measurement matrix based on RIP such that the optimization problem is resolved via [29]; (8) GeneratêI NS ,̂G PS ,̂G PS and̂I NS using MLE (see (11), (13) and (14)); (9) Calculate the likelihoods gps (̂| ) and INS (̂| ) according to (10) and (12); (10) Generate and evaluate the GPS weight GPS according to (8); (11) if GPS = 1, (Free GPS outage) then (12) Predict vehicle position such that (̂| ) = (̂G PS | ) based on (9) and (10); (13) end if (14) if GPS = 0 (Full GPS outage), then (15) Predict vehicle position such that (̂| ) = (̂I NS | ) based on (9) and (12); (16) Otherwise (0 < GPS < 1, Partial GPS outage) (17) Compute (̂G PS∧INS ) = ∑ =1 ( |̂) according to (27); (18) Predict the vehicle position such that ‖̂G PS∧INS ‖ 1 ≥ (19) end if (20) end for (21) Return the predicted measurement of the vehicle position̂(̆). proposed method, the test vehicle was driven along different roads in Hunan University area with different velocities for about 25 minutes.…”
Section: Experiments and Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method is flexible and simple to implement, it is more computer-intensive demanding [14]. To forecast the measurement update of KF method, the authors in [7,15] have introduced the prediction method based on radial basis function (RBF) neural network coupled with time series analysis. In [7], for instance, when GPS outages occur, the outputs of RBF neural network are used straightly to correct the INS results.…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation