2013
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridging scale simulation of lattice fracture using enriched space‐time Finite Element Method

Abstract: SUMMARYA multiscale method that couples the space‐time Finite Element Method with molecular dynamics is developed for the simulation of dynamic fracture problems. A coarse scale description based on finite element discretization is established in the entire domain. This representation overlaps with a detailed atomistic description employed in the region immediately surrounding the crack tip with the goal to capture the initiation and propagation of the fracture. On the basis of the crack evolution informed by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…buckling region, and the coarse scale description became inaccurate. In such cases, the multiscale atomistic/continuum approach, such as those developed previously by the authors [36,[51][52][53] and others [54][55][56][57], shall be further explored.…”
Section: Compression Of a Five-layered Graphene Sheetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…buckling region, and the coarse scale description became inaccurate. In such cases, the multiscale atomistic/continuum approach, such as those developed previously by the authors [36,[51][52][53] and others [54][55][56][57], shall be further explored.…”
Section: Compression Of a Five-layered Graphene Sheetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that the fine scale features of MM model were not well described by the coarse scale SS model in the buckling region, and the coarse scale description became inaccurate. In such cases, the multiscale atomistic/continuum approach, such as those developed previously by the authors and others , shall be further explored.…”
Section: Benchmark Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An elaborate interfacial region is usually set for seamless coupling. Typical concurrent multiscale methods include finite‐element and atomic method, 6 atomistic/dislocation/continuum coupling method, 7 quasi‐continuum method, 8,9 bridging scale method, 10‐13 bridging domain method, 14,15 atomic‐to‐continuum blending method, 16,17 coupling of length scales method 18 . In the far‐field region, the finite element method, 6,7 the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method, 19 the reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM), 11 the meshless local Petrov‐Galerkin (MLPG) method, 20 the material point method (MPM) 21,22 , the peridynamics method (PD), 23 and the dissipative particle dynamics/smoothed dissipative particle dynamics (DPD/SDPD) method 24,25 have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years witnessed fast development of concurrent multiscale methods. Typical concurrent multiscale methods include the coupled atomic and discrete dislocation method , the heterogeneous multiscale method , the bridging scale method , the bridging domain method , blending the stress and the atomic force , combination of the solution processes of MD and FEM , and the coupling method of space‐time finite element and MD . Literatures reviewed concurrent multiscale methods in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%