Bridging the gap: a five stage approach for developing specialty-specific entrustable professional activities

Abstract

BackgroundEntrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are increasingly used as a focus for assessment in graduate medical education (GME). However, a consistent approach to guide EPA design is currently lacking, in particular concerning the actual content (knowledge, skills and attitude required for specific tasks) for EPAs. This paper describes a comprehensive five stage approach, which was used to develop two specialty-specific EPAs in emergency medicine focused on the first year of GME.MethodsThe five stage approach was used to gain consensus on the task, content and entrustment scale for two specialty-specific EPAs in emergency medicine. The participants consisted of twelve clinical supervisors working in the emergency department. The five stages were: 1) Selecting the EPA topic; 2) Developing the EPA content by collecting data from participants using focus group and individual interviews; 3) Drafting the EPAs based on analysis of collected data; 4) Seeking feedback on the draft EPAs from the participants and other stakeholders; 5) Refining and finalising the EPAs based on feedback.ResultsTwo specialty-specific EPAs were developed using the five stage approach. The participants reached consensus on the specific tasks and criteria for performance for the two EPAs. They also agreed that both day-to-day (ad hoc) and formal (summative) entrustment decisions were put into practice through the intensity of supervision provided to PGY1 doctors. As a result, a three level entrustment and supervision scale consisting of direct active, indirect active, passive was developed reflecting the shift in the intensity of supervision from close supervision to minimal supervision.ConclusionsThe five stage approach described in this paper was used successfully to develop two specialty-specific EPAs in emergency medicine along with a three level entrustment scale.We propose that the five stage approach is transferable to a range of medical training contexts to design specialty-specific EPAs.

Not just trust: factors influencing learners’ attempts to perform technical skills on real patients

“…Interestingly, our observation that teachers might withhold learner attempts at technical skills when the emergency department is busy is at odds with Kwan et al's 2016 finding that a busy emergency department and clinical service demands may result in the performance of more – and unsupervised – technical tasks by junior residents. This difference may arise from study settings: ours was a paediatric environment, whereas that in the study by Kwan et al was a general emergency medicine department; other research has suggested that medical teachers are more likely to exclude learners from the care of children than from the care of adults …”

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016

“…Additionally, in the United States, CORD maintains a listserv of EM educators making the widespread administration of Internet‐based, education‐related surveys feasible. A small number of studies included in this review utilized qualitative methods, which is consistent with the critical appraisals from prior years, six in 2016, six in 2015, three in 2014, and seven in 2013.…”

“…Bridging the gap: a five stage approach for developing specialty‐specific entrustable professional activities. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:117 …”

“…As the field of medical education continues to grow, we expect that this trend will continue. There was a decrease in the number of funded studies in 2016; 11% of all articles compared to 20% in 2015 and 16% in 2014. There is some literature to suggest that funded medical education research may be of higher quality .…”

“…Possible explanations for this trend may include a decrease in amount of available funds overall or shifting of research priorities of funding agencies. Three of the 12 highlighted studies were funded …”