2020
DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-1043-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief communication: Ad hoc estimation of glacier contributions to sea-level rise from the latest glaciological observations

Abstract: Abstract. Comprehensive assessments of global glacier mass changes based on a variety of observations and prevailing methodologies have been published at multi-annual intervals. For the years in between, the glaciological method provides annual observations of specific mass changes but is suspected to not be representative at the regional to global scales due to uneven glacier distribution with respect to the full sample. Here, we present a simple approach to estimate and correct for this bias in the glaciolog… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a fraction of the typical magnitude of the surface mass balance (∼−1 m w.e. a −1 on average for the glaciers in Iceland since 1995), the non-surface mass balance ranges from 5 to 38%, largest for FIGURE 6 | Comparison of mass change rates estimated in this study and studies based on glaciological observations provided to the WGMS database (Zemp et al, 2019;Zemp et al, 2020b) and the GRACE observations (Wouters et al, 2019), with the respective estimated uncertainties. The figure shows only the period when Vatnajökull, Hofsjökull, and Langjökull have all been monitored with glaciological observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a fraction of the typical magnitude of the surface mass balance (∼−1 m w.e. a −1 on average for the glaciers in Iceland since 1995), the non-surface mass balance ranges from 5 to 38%, largest for FIGURE 6 | Comparison of mass change rates estimated in this study and studies based on glaciological observations provided to the WGMS database (Zemp et al, 2019;Zemp et al, 2020b) and the GRACE observations (Wouters et al, 2019), with the respective estimated uncertainties. The figure shows only the period when Vatnajökull, Hofsjökull, and Langjökull have all been monitored with glaciological observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We combined eight estimates of mass change from an extrapolation of local glaciological and geodetic measurements (Zemp et al, 2019a(Zemp et al, , 2020, satellite gravimetry (Wouters et al, 2019), satellite swath altimetry (Foresta et al, 2016;Jakob et al, 2020;Tepes et al, 2021), satellite differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (DInSAR) (Braun et al, 2019), and satellite optical stereo images (Dussaillant et al, 2019b;Shean et al, 2020) to produce a reconciled estimate of global glacier mass changes between 1962 and 2019 and over 19 glacier regions defined in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI Consortium, 2017) ( Fig. 2).…”
Section: Mountain Glaciersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; ACS, Arctic Canada South (40 888 km 2 ); ALA, Alaska (86 725 km 2 ); ANT, Antarctic and subantarctic (132 867 km 2 ); CAU, Caucasus and Middle East (1307 km 2 ); CEU, Central Europe (2092 km 2 ); GRL, Greenland (89 717 km 2 ); HMA, High Mountain Asia (97 606 km 2 ); ISL, Iceland (11 059 km 2 ); NZL, New Zealand (1161 km 2 ); RUA, Russian Arctic (51 591 km 2 ); SAN, Southern Andes (29 429 km 2 ); SCA, Scandinavia (2949 km 2 ); SJM, Svalbard and Jan Mayen (33 958 km 2 ); TRP, low latitudes (2341 km 2 ); WNA, Western Canada and USA (14 524 km 2 ). (b) Glacier rate of mass change (Gt yr −1 ) in regions where estimates from different techniques are available, including satellite altimetry (Foresta et al, 2016;Jakob et al, 2020;Tepes et al, 2021), extrapolation of in situ glaciological and geodetic data (Zemp et al, 2019b(Zemp et al, , 2020, satellite gravimetry (Wouters et al, 2019), satellite InSAR (Braun et al, 2019), and satellite stereo imagery (Dussaillant et al, 2019b;Shean et al, 2020) over the period 2010-2015. The reconciled estimate (calculated as the average of the estimates available in a given region and year) is shown in grey.…”
Section: Ice Sheetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combined 6 estimates of mass change from an extrapolation of local glaciological and geodetic measurements (Zemp et al, 2019(Zemp et al, , 2020, satellite gravimetry (Wouters et al, 2019), satellite swath altimetry (Foresta et al, 2016;Jakob et al, 2020;Tepes et al, 2020) and satellite synthetic differential aperture radar interferometry (DInSAR) (Braun et al, 2019), to produce a reconciled estimate of global glacier mass changes between 1962 and 2019 and over 19 glacier regions defined in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI Consortium, 2017) ( Fig. 2).…”
Section: Mountain Glaciersmentioning
confidence: 99%