2016
DOI: 10.1167/16.12.244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief presentation enhances various simultaneous contrast effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4-6). Therefore, the known reduction in bias for longer presentation durations 5,6,18 can be attributed to changes in decision-related mechanisms that are measured here using RT-based analysis. Findings were replicated using a larger sample size through the Amazon Mechanical Turk (N > 50 per experiment, see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4-6). Therefore, the known reduction in bias for longer presentation durations 5,6,18 can be attributed to changes in decision-related mechanisms that are measured here using RT-based analysis. Findings were replicated using a larger sample size through the Amazon Mechanical Turk (N > 50 per experiment, see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most importantly, the finding of reduced bias with longer decision times may appear to perfectly conform with a dualtheory account of a transition between separate systems 7,28,29 : from a fast system that is bias-prone, to a slow system that is bias-free. Similarly, the known reduction in context-dependent bias with the duration of testing stimulus presentations is currently explained by assuming dual processing (in low vs. high systems) 5,6,18 . However, we have found that using models based on the decision principles described above offers a full mechanistic explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most importantly, the finding of reduced bias with longer decision times may appear to perfectly conform with a dual-theory account of a transition between separate systems (Evans & Stanovich, 2013;Kahneman, 2011;Tversky & Kahneman, 1974): from a fast system that is biasprone, to a slow system that is bias-free. Similarly, the known reduction in context-dependent bias with the duration of testing stimulus presentations can currently be explained by assuming dual processing (in low vs. high systems) (Kaneko et al, 2017;Wolfe, 1984). However, we have found that using models based on the decision principles described above offers a full mechanistic explanation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…5 First, we measured the influence of oriented context on a subsequently perceived orientation (tilt aftereffect, TAE). To verify that the decision time is not confounded with the presentation duration of the test (Kaneko, Anstis, & Kuriki, 2017;Wolfe, 1984), we used briefly presented stimuli (50 ms "non-retinotopic" in the sense that the adaptor and the test were presented at different retinal positions). Note that unlike the known reduction in the aftereffect magnitude with increased time difference between the adapting context and the test (Magnussen & Johnsen, 1986), here the involvement of decision mechanisms was measured using a fixed target-to-adapter time by analyzing the TAE at different reaction times.…”
Section: Context-dependent Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%