1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00454-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bright-state expansion and optimal control of highly excited polyatomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18] All of these, when tested in very simple model systems, appear to work in the sense that they support the generation of a control field that very efficiently affects the selected population transfer between states. However, none of the reduced state representations has been tested with respect to robustness as a function of number of degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…[15][16][17][18] All of these, when tested in very simple model systems, appear to work in the sense that they support the generation of a control field that very efficiently affects the selected population transfer between states. However, none of the reduced state representations has been tested with respect to robustness as a function of number of degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In our previous investigations 11,4 we demonstrated selective excitation of any mode of linear acetylene ͑HCCH͒ as well as breaking of the CH bond with at most a pair of femtosecond, transform-limited infrared pulses of limited intensity. Although we showed a generic way to selectively excite the infrared-inactive CC stretch by a number of quanta ͑3 and 4 were demonstrated͒ with only a few infrared laser pulses, we do not envision a way to selectively break the very strong CC triple bond in acetylene with infrared laser pulses.…”
Section: Selective Ch-bond Excitation With a Single Frequency-swmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[21][22][23][24][25] If the dynamics admit a significant reduction in N to an effective dimension N eff , the detriment of the factorial dimensional scaling of the suboptimal critical regions may be mitigated. The determination of the difference between the effective dimension N eff and the true Hilbert space dimension N of the system is necessarily dependent on the nature of the coupling of the system levels, the resolution and range of the controls, and the structure of the observable being optimized.…”
Section: A the Effective Dynamical Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 98%