“…[Levitt, 2001] Originally, the author was referring to these assets on the individual level, showing the ideal type of a successful (rich) returning migrant who brings from the country of destination a new, fresh look on the problems of its home country, and the (allegedly) more development-oriented values and practices, and also the social ties to other rich migrants, making them an ideal actor to initiate deep transformations in the migrantsending community. Later [Levitt -Lamba, 2011] she focused on migrant associations, given the fact that an individual rarely has the force to transform a whole community, while associations can do an important work, as for example in the Dominican context, where it was the migrant associations that took on topics that were previously taboo, such as teenage pregnancy, reproductive health and AIDS awareness, and brought a high valuation of culture, sports and recreation, and the culture of fundraising by campaigns.…”