2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Beaumont and Tinch (2004) find that the abatement cost curve methodology proves to be a valuable management tool in identifying barriers to achieving the win-win state, or at least win-draw scenario for industry and the environment, and also in providing future direction for the waste management strategy. Cerin (2006) supports Porter hypothesis and finds the private incentives to explore the win-win development by applying the Coase theorem that emphasizes transaction costs and property rights. This paper argues that strong public support is needed to create private incentives for exploring economic and environmental win-win innovations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Beaumont and Tinch (2004) find that the abatement cost curve methodology proves to be a valuable management tool in identifying barriers to achieving the win-win state, or at least win-draw scenario for industry and the environment, and also in providing future direction for the waste management strategy. Cerin (2006) supports Porter hypothesis and finds the private incentives to explore the win-win development by applying the Coase theorem that emphasizes transaction costs and property rights. This paper argues that strong public support is needed to create private incentives for exploring economic and environmental win-win innovations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The time-period considered for this survey starts from 2000, when the scientific debate started (in line with [30,38,61,68]). In order to include in the literature analysis all the relevant papers, we selected them in two steps, coherently with the suggestions of Luederitz et al [66]: (I-A) Data Screening, which concerns the search in the established databases through the established keywords; and (I-B) Data Cleaning, which concerns the evaluation of each papers selected in the previous (I-A) step, in order to decide their inclusion in the research sample, based on the coherency of the title, abstract and full text with the research sub-question (i).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These hypotheses may be considered to be an evolution of the "win-win approach" that was previously adopted by some authors to explain the positive two-way relationship between EP and BP [30,107].…”
Section: Determining the Type Of Ep-bp Relationship (Step Iv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This symbol conveys effective information from a provider to a user: this product should not be disposed of in a regular dustbin from an environmental viewpoint. As is explained by Cerin (Cerin 2006), this type of information flow has potential to decrease the environmental impact. However, everything is not covered by regulations.…”
Section: Information Product Money Human Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%