Developmental Assets and Asset-Building Communities 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0091-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bringing in a New Era in the Field of Youth Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For one thing, community itself has not been a level of analysis that psychology has looked to frequently in its examinations of child development, at least in comparison to the multitude of studies on parent-child, child-child, and teacher-child and classroom-child interaction. The positive youth approach is consciously holistic, considering the whole community in relation to the whole child rather than privileging any particular interaction or capacity (Damon and Gregory 2002). For another thing, the positive youth approach sees the child as a full partner in the community-child relation, bearing a full share of rights and responsibilities.…”
Section: How Children Interact With Their Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one thing, community itself has not been a level of analysis that psychology has looked to frequently in its examinations of child development, at least in comparison to the multitude of studies on parent-child, child-child, and teacher-child and classroom-child interaction. The positive youth approach is consciously holistic, considering the whole community in relation to the whole child rather than privileging any particular interaction or capacity (Damon and Gregory 2002). For another thing, the positive youth approach sees the child as a full partner in the community-child relation, bearing a full share of rights and responsibilities.…”
Section: How Children Interact With Their Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Deficit reduction' vs. 'Asset promotion' (Benson, Journal of Psychology in Africa 2007 17(1&2);173-180 175 2003), or 'Needs-based approach' vs. 'Asset-based approach' , or 'Negative influence on wellbeing' vs. 'Positive influence on wellbeing' (Stokols, 2003). Many authors (Benson, 2003;Campos, 2003;Csikszentmihalyi, 2003;Damon & Gregory, 2003;Diener, 2003;Sheldon & King, 2001) writing about the asset-based approach and Positive Psychology also reacted against the dominance of the deficit paradigm and often build their arguments for exploring positive constructs by starting to question the primacy of the deficit paradigm. I think that this symbiosis with deficit thinking is beneficial to theory development and a deeper understanding of practice.…”
Section: What Have We Learned Of the Asset-based Approach?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such content involves longstanding virtues such as benevolence, justice, propriety, and trustworthiness (Damon and Gregory 2003). Many of these virtues are universally virtuous; especially when they endorse the Golden Rules or categorical imperatives of (1) treating others like treating oneself, (2) respecting others as an end rather than a means, and (3) universalized application that receives everyone's support (Holmes 2003).…”
Section: Research Aimsmentioning
confidence: 98%