Brown bear habituation to people—safety, risks, and benefits

Abstract

Recently, brown bear (Ursus arctos) viewing has increased in coastal Alaska and British Columbia, as well as in interior areas such as Yellowstone National Park. Viewing is most often being done under conditions that offer acceptable safety to both people and bears. We analyze and comment on the underlying processes that lead brown bears to tolerate people at close range. Although habituation is an important process influencing the distance at which bears tolerate people, other variables also modify levels of bear-to-human tolerance. Because bears may react internally with energetic costs before showing an overt reaction to humans, we propose a new term, the Overt Reaction Distance, to emphasize that what we observe is the external reaction of a bear. In this paper we conceptually analyze bear viewing in terms of benefits and risks to people and bears. We conclude that managers and policy-makers must develop site-specific plans that identify the extent to which bear-to-human habituation and tolerance will be permitted. The proposed management needs scientific underpinning. It is our belief that bear viewing, where appropriate, may promote conservation of bear populations, habitats, and ecosystems as it instills respect and concern in those who participate.

Stakeholders' Attitudes Toward Black Bear in East Texas

“…Concerns about bears have been related to degree of education and age (Kellert et al, 1996) in most studies (except in Bowman et al, 2001). The primary reason for nuisance conflict is humancaused attractants, such as garbage and food (Herrero, Smith, DeBruyn, Gunther, & Matt, 2005). To some degree these variables and predicted situations are beyond managers' control.…”

Dispersal of male bears into peripheral habitats inferred from mtDNA haplotypes

“…Regular exposure of wildlife to anthropogenic food resources may not just set the stage for localized conflict-it may also foster the development of "problem" behavior such as stock-killing or cropraiding and increase the physical risk of attacks on humans and their pets (Woodroffe et al 2005a). Human presence affects the habituation behavior of brown bears, resulting in an increase in negative encounters with humans, including fatal accidents (North America: Mattson et al 1987Mattson et al , 1992Olson et al 1997;Herrero et al 2005, Europe: Rauer et al 2003Martin et al 2010). Recent adaptation to urban and suburban habitats likely took place over several generations, and such adaptation may have involved learned behaviors passed from parent to offspring (Baker and Timm 1998).…”

Active fans and grizzly bears: Reducing risks for wilderness campers

“…A bear's reaction in an encounter with a person and the outcome for that person may be influenced by a diverse range of variables related to the bear's environment (e.g., encounter circumstances, seasonal habitat quality, visibility), the bear (e.g., species, sex/age class, experience with humans), and the person involved (e.g., person's activity, group size, person's behaviour towards the bear, the availability of deterrents) (Herrero, 2003;Herrero et al, 2005). Close proximity of bears and humans is a common circumstance in encounters that result in human injury (Herrero, 2003).…”