2019
DOI: 10.18573/mas.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bruce Lee and the Invention of Jeet Kune Do: The Theory of Martial Creation

Abstract: and is the co-founder of the Documents Research Network (DRN). He studies martial arts cultures, pedagogies and philosophies from an anthropological and a sociological perspective using a variety of qualitative methods. Most recently, he has researched subcultures of wing chun kung fu, xilam, and the invention of other new Mexican martial arts. He is currently interested in the development of specific theories of creation in martial arts, and is undertaking a dual linguistic ethnography of HEMA and taijiquan.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jennings' ( 2019 ) “theory of martial creation” emerges at the intersection of Mills's ( 1959 ) “sociological imagination” and Shilling ( 2008 ) call for a more pragmatist orientation to the study of the body. The former, a reaction to the structural-functionalism of Talcott Parsons' sociology, is primarily concerned with directing scholars' attention to the manners in which macro-sociocultural processes and historical events intertwine with—and could be studied through—individual biographies; the latter, distancing itself from what it perceives to be the limits of “the dominant traditions in sociology” (Shilling, 2008 :3), rehabilitates the pragmatist notion of “habit” (Dewey, 1922 ) and focuses on moments of crises that stimulate social actors' creativity and actions oriented to social change.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Sketchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Jennings' ( 2019 ) “theory of martial creation” emerges at the intersection of Mills's ( 1959 ) “sociological imagination” and Shilling ( 2008 ) call for a more pragmatist orientation to the study of the body. The former, a reaction to the structural-functionalism of Talcott Parsons' sociology, is primarily concerned with directing scholars' attention to the manners in which macro-sociocultural processes and historical events intertwine with—and could be studied through—individual biographies; the latter, distancing itself from what it perceives to be the limits of “the dominant traditions in sociology” (Shilling, 2008 :3), rehabilitates the pragmatist notion of “habit” (Dewey, 1922 ) and focuses on moments of crises that stimulate social actors' creativity and actions oriented to social change.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Sketchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former, a reaction to the structural-functionalism of Talcott Parsons' sociology, is primarily concerned with directing scholars' attention to the manners in which macro-sociocultural processes and historical events intertwine with—and could be studied through—individual biographies; the latter, distancing itself from what it perceives to be the limits of “the dominant traditions in sociology” (Shilling, 2008 :3), rehabilitates the pragmatist notion of “habit” (Dewey, 1922 ) and focuses on moments of crises that stimulate social actors' creativity and actions oriented to social change. As Jennings' ( 2019 :62) comments, “[t]aken together, these provide a powerful framework for understanding how and why a person might create a new martial arts system,” and I would like to add—in line with the purpose of this paper—also the specific health philosophies and conceptions of health that are informing a given martial arts system.…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Sketchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations