1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00372858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble-column design for growth of fragile insect cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kilburn and Webb (1968) demonstrated the protective effects of Pluronic F68 in moderating cell damage. Tramper et al (1987) suggested the concept of a killing volume that was associated with bubble frequency and independent of rise height, and therefore, cell damage was primarily as a result of bubble disengagement. Handa et al (1987) and later Handa-Corrigan et al (1989) formalized these concepts into an experimental framework and showed that cell damage occurs due to bubble bursting, and that the amount of damage was related to the bubble size and frequency and that cell damage could be reduced by the addition of Pluronic F68.…”
Section: -63 Bubble-induced Cell Damage In Sparged Suspension Cultmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kilburn and Webb (1968) demonstrated the protective effects of Pluronic F68 in moderating cell damage. Tramper et al (1987) suggested the concept of a killing volume that was associated with bubble frequency and independent of rise height, and therefore, cell damage was primarily as a result of bubble disengagement. Handa et al (1987) and later Handa-Corrigan et al (1989) formalized these concepts into an experimental framework and showed that cell damage occurs due to bubble bursting, and that the amount of damage was related to the bubble size and frequency and that cell damage could be reduced by the addition of Pluronic F68.…”
Section: -63 Bubble-induced Cell Damage In Sparged Suspension Cultmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After nearly two decades of research, it is now generally accepted that mechanical damage of freely suspended cells is due to bubble hydrodynamics, in particular the bubble-bursting phenomena at the headspace gas-liquid interface (Handa et al, 1987;Tramper et al, 1987;Handa-Corrigan et al, 1989;Oh et al, 1989Oh et al, , 1992Chalmers and Bavarian, 1991;Kioukia et al, 1992;Meier et al, 1999). Four bubble-liquid-cell regions where cell damage can occur can be identified: (1) bubble formation at the sparger, (2) bubble coalescence and breakup in the impeller discharge, (3) bubble rise through the bioreactor, and (4) bubble bursting at the air-medium interface.…”
Section: -63 Bubble-induced Cell Damage In Sparged Suspension Cultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the extent of cell death is proportional to the aeration rate Q and the specific volume in the wake of rising bubbles V K , and is inversely proportional to the diameter of the reactor d R , the height of fluid h L and the bubble diameter d B [35,36]. In this context, bubble rupture is the event with the most effect on cell viability.…”
Section: Aeration-related Shear Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of bubble size and frequency and reactor geometry on cell damage can be predicted successfully (Tramper et al, 1988;Wang et al, 1994); however, the effects of medium composition have not been successfully accounted for. Certain nonionic surfactants, such as Pluronic F-68, are known to decrease damage, but attempts to correlate cell damage with the static surface tension or bulk viscosity have not been successful (Michaels and Papoutsakis, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%