2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubble formation and Kr distribution in Kr-irradiated UO2

Abstract: In situ and ex situ transmission electron microscopy observation of small Kr bubbles in both single-crystal and polycrystalline UO 2 were conducted to understand the inert gas bubble behavior in oxide nuclear fuel. The bubble size and volume swelling are shown as weak functions of ion dose but strongly depend on the temperature. The Kr bubble formation at room temperature was observed for the first time. The depth profiles of implanted Kr determined by atom probe tomography are in good agreement with the calcu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is in disagreement with the recent work of He et al [14] where formation of Kr nano-bubbles in UO 2 thin foils was followed by TEM. In this study, UO 2 samples were implanted at room temperature with krypton atoms up to a Kr-local concentration of 0.2 at.% which is close to the implantation conditions B and C used in the present work.…”
Section: Kr Incorporation In the Uo 2 Latticecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is in disagreement with the recent work of He et al [14] where formation of Kr nano-bubbles in UO 2 thin foils was followed by TEM. In this study, UO 2 samples were implanted at room temperature with krypton atoms up to a Kr-local concentration of 0.2 at.% which is close to the implantation conditions B and C used in the present work.…”
Section: Kr Incorporation In the Uo 2 Latticecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Kr atoms depth distribution determined by Atom Probe Tomography (APT), the authors assumed that these nano-objects are krypton bubbles. However, as pointed out by He et al [14], no Kr ion clusters have been detected during the APT analysis and as a consequence no experimental proof of Kr atoms presence within the nano-objects is provided. Based on the results shown in the present work and obtained by Sabathier et al [15], the nano-objects observed at room temperature after implantation by He et al [14] are most likely empty and Kr atoms observed by APT are located within bound Schottky defect.…”
Section: Kr Incorporation In the Uo 2 Latticementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This value of effective U corresponds to U = 4.50 eV and = 0.54 eV, which were determined in UO 2 by Yamazaki and Kotani [23] based on the analysis of X-ray photoemission spectra. To avoid local energy minima for finding low-energy 5 orbital occupations in UO 2 , the procedure of U-ramping method is used [24,25]. 2+ .…”
Section: Calculation Methods and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These latter phenomena have been actively investigated by computational methods 19,45,46 and very little experimental data exist and are a subject of future work. 47,48 The stopping and range of ions in matter (SRIM) code was used to estimate the displacement damage. 49 Calculations were done using the Kinchin-Pease method and the Norgett, Robinson, and Torrens (NRT) model.…”
Section: Measurements In Ion Irradiated Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%