2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.115467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BubCNN: Bubble detection using Faster RCNN and shape regression network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional classification of intersection-over-union (IoU) is modified in inclined NMS to be IoU between two inclined bounding boxes. The IoU calculation method is used [19].…”
Section: Non-maximum Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional classification of intersection-over-union (IoU) is modified in inclined NMS to be IoU between two inclined bounding boxes. The IoU calculation method is used [19].…”
Section: Non-maximum Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach based on machine learning has been proposed by Haas et al [63] In contrast to conventional image processing, features are not extracted manually, but the program learns to identify bubbles based on a labeled training data set. The detector, called BubCNN, shown in Figure 6, employs two pretrained modules, a Faster region-based convolutional neural network (RCNN) [64] and a shape regression CNN.…”
Section: Bubcnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be considered that the detection missing rate of automatic detectors depends on the local void fraction. [63] Therefore, the measurement uncertainty might be slightly higher at lower heights because the local void fraction is highest close to the porous plug. The bubble size distributions obtained by the different techniques are shown in Figure 7(b).…”
Section: E Uncertainty Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in microflow gauging, the bubble size and velocity are monitored in real time and compensated for in the fluid volume, which is a relatively effective method. Many technologies are currently adopted for the detection of microbubbles in tubes, such as capacitive detection [7], photoelectric detection [8], ultrasonic detection [9], image processing [10,11], etc. For capacitive detection, a high detection accuracy is difficult to obtain, and the photoelectric detection method is affected by the liquid's color.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%