1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00134.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buccal mucosal graft for secondary hypospadias repair and urethral replacement

Abstract: Objective  To assess the effectiveness of buccal mucosa in the treatment of complex hypospadias Patients and methods Seventeen patients had an onlay patch of buccal mucosa to reconstruct the urethra after failed previous surgery; five had a tubed buccal mucosal graft as an urethral replacement in the ‘primary’ repair of severe hypospadias. Results There were no complications in 19 patients; two developed fistulae and one a stricture due to graft narrowing. There were no meatal complications. Conclusion Buccal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These reports have noted complication rates ranging from 14-57% [16-20], with most complications occurring early (within 6–12 months) after buccal repair [19,20]. Although our early experience with buccal grafts had a complication rate higher than the range previously noted in the literature, our more recent experience is congruent with that of other centers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These reports have noted complication rates ranging from 14-57% [16-20], with most complications occurring early (within 6–12 months) after buccal repair [19,20]. Although our early experience with buccal grafts had a complication rate higher than the range previously noted in the literature, our more recent experience is congruent with that of other centers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Only small defects can be closed primarily without disturbing the function of the parotid duct. With all its side effects secondary healing is the traditional way (Ahmed & Gough 1997). Discomfort in the early post‐operative period has been described, too, when the explantation site had been covered by Lyodura, Syspurderm or Ethisorp (Szulczewski et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compromised tissue vascularity and insufficient penile and preputial skin create a difficult setting in which to reconstruct a viable, patent neourethra. Numerous tissues and techniques have been described for repairing hypospadias complications, including buccal mucosa [8] split‐thickness skin graft [9], and tunica vaginalis [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compromised tissue vascularity and insufficient penile and preputial skin create a difficult setting in which to reconstruct a viable, patent neourethra. Numerous tissues and techniques have been described for repairing hypospadias complications, including buccal mucosa [8] split-thickness skin graft [9], and tunica vaginalis [10,11]. Urethrocutaneous fistulae and proximal urethral and meatal strictures comprise the most common complications of primary hypospadias repair that require reoperation [2,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%