2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buccolingual inclinations of posterior teeth in subjects with different facial patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

9
35
1
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
35
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with molars of patients with the vertical growth pattern, molars of those with the horizontal growth pattern had a significantly greater buccal inclination in the posterior region, similar to the results of Janson et al (2004). Functional hyperactivity of the masticatory system imposes increased stress on the bony structures of the craniofacial complex with possible influences on its structure (Kiliaridis et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with molars of patients with the vertical growth pattern, molars of those with the horizontal growth pattern had a significantly greater buccal inclination in the posterior region, similar to the results of Janson et al (2004). Functional hyperactivity of the masticatory system imposes increased stress on the bony structures of the craniofacial complex with possible influences on its structure (Kiliaridis et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The 3D position of the teeth and jaw bone is dependent on the combination of these three forces. Initially, the mandibular molars erupt lingually, and then move buccally due to tongue pressure and masseter function (Janson et al, 2004). Finally, the molars reach a balanced position (Masumoto et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Janson et al 23 reported that there was no statistical variation between low and high angle subjects in mandibular posterior tooth inclination but that maxillary molars had greater buccal inclination in high angle a No statistically significant difference between male and female in all groups. For F/M combined upper angle, statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 3 and groups 2 and 3, but not between groups 1 and 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Nuestros resultados mostraron que la inclinación promedio del primer molar superior derecho fue de 80,00 ± 7,11º, 18 A similarity may be established, especially in terms of mandibular molars, and some difference in the maxillary molars, which can be explained by variability in growth patterns. 19 Finally, the correlation analyzed in this study showed that no significant relationships were found in evaluating overall discrepancies, but in grouping them according to whether the discrepancy (it is, the difference between transverse mandibular and maxillary length) is greater than 5 mm (positive) or shorter than 5 mm (negative), the study did find correlations with the inclination of both upper and lower molars, suggesting different behaviors in both groups. In the negative correlations, where the discrepancy is closer to 5 mm, the inclination of upper molars with respect to the OP tends to decrease, but when the discrepancy is positive, the tendency is that the more it increases and deviates from 5 mm, the bigger the angle tends to be.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…18 Se puede establecer una similitud, sobre todo en los molares mandibulares, y algo de diferencia en los maxilares, lo que se puede explicar por la variabilidad que existe en los patrones de crecimiento. 19 Finalmente, la correlación objeto de este estudio mostró que, al evaluar las discrepancias en conjunto, no se encontraron relaciones significativas, pero al agruparlas según si la discrepancia (o sea la diferencia entre la longitud transversal maxilar y mandibular) es mayor a 5 mm (positiva) o menor a 5 mm (negativa), sí se hallaron correlaciones con la inclinación de los molares tanto superiores como inferiores, lo que indica que existen comportamientos diferentes en los dos grupos. En las negativas, en la medida en que la discrepancia se acerca a 5 mm, la inclinación de los molares superiores con respecto al PO tiende a disminuir, pero cuando la discrepancia es positiva, la tendencia es que mientras más aumente y se aleje de los 5 mm, la angulación tiende a aumentar de igual forma.…”
unclassified