2019
DOI: 10.21533/pen.v7i3.728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis of reinforced composite plates with a multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT)

Abstract: Buckling analysis of mechanical structures is essential to insure stability under loading .Critical load of buckling refer to the maximum load can be withstood without losing of stability and avoid a catastrophic damage due to the collapse of columns .Improving of mechanical properties spatially those related with elastic behaviors of materials can lead to improving buckling since it can be raised the value of critical load. Nanotechnology is one of the modern methods which makes significant effects on the mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9. Von Mises Stress distribution for PLA+15%Carbon plate with two holes Whereas σ max : maximum nodal Von mises stress σ nom : average Von mises stress Based on the results of the analysis and the use of equation 3, the theoretical stress concentration of the plate (PLA, PLA with 15% carbon) was 2.16 and 2.35 respectively, As in Table (II) which is consistent with the source (12,13) about that the coefficient of stress concentration is a function depending on the material and geometry of the part. If the material is brittle or ductile with the type of loading mode (type) at the load is static or dynamic.…”
Section: K a =supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Figure 9. Von Mises Stress distribution for PLA+15%Carbon plate with two holes Whereas σ max : maximum nodal Von mises stress σ nom : average Von mises stress Based on the results of the analysis and the use of equation 3, the theoretical stress concentration of the plate (PLA, PLA with 15% carbon) was 2.16 and 2.35 respectively, As in Table (II) which is consistent with the source (12,13) about that the coefficient of stress concentration is a function depending on the material and geometry of the part. If the material is brittle or ductile with the type of loading mode (type) at the load is static or dynamic.…”
Section: K a =supporting
confidence: 70%
“…The governing equations of this study are based on the one-dimensional flow of an open channel, which are continuity and energy equations. The way in which the suggested configuration are compared depends primarily on energy loss as a result of the settling basin, where the specific energy of flowing water is expressed by the following formula [7][8][9]: 1where y is the flow depth (m), V is the mean velocity (m/s), and g is the acceleration of gravity (m/s 2 ). The specific energy (E) of a fluid in an open channel is defined as the total mechanical energy (expressed as a head) relative to the bottom of the channel.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been carried out on the form, size, and details of stilling basins. In a study conduct-ed by [7] that dealt with a stilling basin provided with an intermediate sill, the impact of a constant, trans-verse sill on the hydraulic jump was evaluated. It was discovered that a sill-controlled energy dissipater could be much more effective and requires both less tailwater and duration of basin compared to free jump-ing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%