2020
DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buddhism, Free Will, and Punishment: Taking Buddhist Ethics Seriously

Abstract: In recent decades, there has been growing interest among philosophers in what the various Buddhist traditions have said, can say, and should say, in response to the traditional problem of free will. This article investigates the relationship between Buddhist philosophy and the historical problem of free will. It begins by critically examining Rick Repetti's Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2019), in which he argues for a conception of “agentless agency” and defends a view he calls “Buddhist soft compatibil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These illusions are various presentations of craving that we need to quell if we intend to reach to the path of illumination. Even though, Buddhism is the underpin of moral responsibilities, the interconnection of Buddhism and karma undermines the commitments of Buddhism to the moral responsibilities for our actions (Caruso, 2020).…”
Section: Buddhismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These illusions are various presentations of craving that we need to quell if we intend to reach to the path of illumination. Even though, Buddhism is the underpin of moral responsibilities, the interconnection of Buddhism and karma undermines the commitments of Buddhism to the moral responsibilities for our actions (Caruso, 2020).…”
Section: Buddhismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repetti uses Mele's term “soft‐compatiblism” to describe the free will or “mental freedom” enjoyed by the ārya independent of the truth of causal determinism. Soft‐compatibilism is conceived in response to the “hard incompatibilist” thesis that free will and moral responsibility are inconsistent with both determinism and indeterminism (for Buddhist versions, see Goodman 2016; Caruso 2020). Although Repetti classifies my view regarding what Buddhists can say about free will under the broader category of “semicompatibilism” (section 3.8), I have argued that Buddhists have the resources to account for personal agency, self‐control, and moral responsibility in a way that is neutral with respect to the truth of causal determinism.…”
Section: Buddhist Soft‐compatiblism Dharma‐responsiveness and Sourcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of rehabilitation is an alternative that can be used as a guide in handling cases. Buddhism in understanding these actions prioritizes compassion and compassion (Caruso, 2020). Punishment without compromise is considered not in accordance with the precepts of Buddhism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%