Budget institutions and fiscal performance in Latin America

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu In this paper we collect detailed information on the budget institutions of Latin American countries. We classify these institutions on a "hierarchical"/"collegial" scale, as a function of the existence of constraints on the deficit, and voting rules. We show that "hierarchical" and transparent procedures have been associated with more fiscal discipline in Latin America in the eighties and early nineties. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

Popular Financial Reports as Fiscal Transparency Mechanisms: An Assessment Using the Fiscal Transparency Index for the Citizen User

“…Countries with lower transparency issued more debt, and increasing transparency led to the reduction in deficit financing. This finding is consistent with a study of Latin American countries that concluded that greater transparency resulted in lower debt levels and better fiscal discipline (Alesina et al, 1999). Although Benito and Bastida (2009) could not confirm the debt results in their study of OECD countries using a different transparency index, they did find that transparency leads to a balanced budget.…”

Budgetary Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Egypt: Is There a Link?

“…budgetary institutions are defined as all rules, regulations, and principles that govern and shape the budgetary process and the relative division of roles, powers, and responsibilities among the various key players involved at each stage of the process. In other words, budgetary institutions include all rules and procedures according to which budgets are drafted, approved, and implemented (Alesina et al, 1999;Allen, Banerji, and Nabil 2004;Gleich 2003;Gollwitzer 2010). Such rules might be either formal (as reflected in constitutions, laws, regulations, manuals, etc.…”

“…In light of the persistent budget deficits and rising public debt levels in both developed and developing countries, a large amount of research has been accumulated to empirically address whether numerical indices that summarize key aspects of budgetary institutions are correlated with fiscal performance indicators (Krogstrup and Walti 2008;Dabla-Norris et al, 2010). Alesina et al (1999) were the first to formally measure the quality of budget institutions in developing countries by creating an index comprised of ten different components related to different stages of the budgetary process. They found that procedures which include constraints on the deficit and are more hierarchical and transparent lead to lower ratios of primary deficit to GDP.…”

Competitive Institution Building: The PT and Participatory Budgeting in Rio Grande do Sul

“…Participatory budgeting also appealed to middle sectors on the basis of improved efficiency. Some observers might suspect that direct pressure and regional demands would damage administrative capacity by dispersing control over decisions (Alesina et al 1996).18 Efficient allocation of resources, after all, was already difficult in the context of inflation; fiscal surprises, such as economic downturns; and projects that surpassed their expected cost. In Rio Grande do Sul, PB coincided with increased administrative efficiency in terms of the predictability of state spending and revenues.…”