2015
DOI: 10.3313/jls.52.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffer movement analysis and blunder probability analysis for GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15) were highly similar, in all four districts. Furthermore, examining many studies (e.g., Osanai et al 2007;Wakai et al 2008;Sakai et al 2013;Hamasaki et al 2015) on slope failure hazard evaluation due to earthquakes reveals many cases in which the slope angle is mentioned as an evaluation factor. Therefore, we determined that it was not appropriate to evaluate the slope failure hazards due to earthquakes without the slope angle and decided to add it to the evaluation factors.…”
Section: Relationship Between Landslide Hazard Rank and Earthquake-in...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15) were highly similar, in all four districts. Furthermore, examining many studies (e.g., Osanai et al 2007;Wakai et al 2008;Sakai et al 2013;Hamasaki et al 2015) on slope failure hazard evaluation due to earthquakes reveals many cases in which the slope angle is mentioned as an evaluation factor. Therefore, we determined that it was not appropriate to evaluate the slope failure hazards due to earthquakes without the slope angle and decided to add it to the evaluation factors.…”
Section: Relationship Between Landslide Hazard Rank and Earthquake-in...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have attempted to map slope failure hazards using various techniques. More recently, many researchers and engineers have performed landslide hazard assessment using geographic information systems (GIS) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Furthermore, some researchers reported a method of evaluating slope failure hazard using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method [16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%