2014
DOI: 10.1177/1049731514536475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Bridge or Digging a Pipeline? Clinical Data Mining in Evidence-Informed Knowledge Building

Abstract: Challenging the ''bridge metaphor'' theme of this conference, this article contends that current practice-research integration strategies are more like research-to-practice ''pipelines.'' The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the potential of clinical data-mining studies conducted by practitioners, practitioner-oriented PhD students, and methodologically pluralist researchers to promoting a truly collaborative, two-way traffic in evidence-informed knowledge building.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each stage of the metamorphosis from research instrument to practice tool involved collaboration, so it serves as a useful case study for bringing research and practice closer together. 'Bridging the gap' is a popular metaphor for improving the link between research and practice, but some attempts to do so have been criticised for being more akin to "digging a pipeline" (Epstein, 2015;pp. 499).…”
Section: 'Bridging the Gap'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each stage of the metamorphosis from research instrument to practice tool involved collaboration, so it serves as a useful case study for bringing research and practice closer together. 'Bridging the gap' is a popular metaphor for improving the link between research and practice, but some attempts to do so have been criticised for being more akin to "digging a pipeline" (Epstein, 2015;pp. 499).…”
Section: 'Bridging the Gap'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este contexto, emergen perspectivas que privilegian aproximaciones inductivas basadas en la práctica (Ku y Ma, 2015); rechazan los ensayos aleatorios controlados como única forma de construcción de evidencia válida (Webber, 2014); favorecen estrategias de investigación cualitativas y cuantitativas, orientadas por procesos heurísticos que no se rijan por la estandarización de instrumentos y escalas (Dominelli, 2015); proponen una investigación formativa, más que acumulativa, dirigida por los protagonistas de los procesos de intervención (Smith, 2014). Este movimiento en la postura epistemológica para investigar la intervención es denominado investigación basada en la práctica (Practice-based research-PBR), y pretende relativizar la reificación de la evidencia, a través de la propuesta de una práctica informada en evidencia (Evidence informed practice-EIP), pero no basada exclusivamente en ella (Auslander y Rosenne, 2016;Austin e Isokuortti, 2016;Epstein, 2009Epstein, , 2011Epstein, , 2014Epstein, , 2016Epstein et al, 2015;Fouché y Bartley, 2016;Julkunen y Uggerhoj, 2016;Natland, Weissinger, Graaf y Carnochan, 2016;Rawles, 2016;Satka, Kääriäinen y Yliruka, 2016). Estos argumentos abogan por una concepción de las prácticas de intervención más cercana al arte que a las ciencias.…”
Section: Perspectivas Críticas Sobre La Práctica Basada En Evidenciaunclassified
“…These approaches have advanced the evidence-base of social work practice, but have tended to rely on “a unidirectional flow from research to practice” without a clear understanding of how the context and realities of practice shape the use of research in practice settings and how the generation of practice-base evidence can help integrate research and practice (Epstein, 2015, p. 499). Implementation science can advance social work’s effort to bring research and practice closer together since this emerging field focuses on understanding the processes and factors that influence the integration and use of research and empirically-supported interventions and policies into practice across multiple service sectors relevant to social work (e.g., health and mental health care systems, child welfare, schools, social services) (Proctor et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%