2013
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2226593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a Forward-Mode Three-Dimensional Reflectance Model for Topographic Normalization of High-Resolution (1–5 m) Imagery: Validation Phase in a Forested Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for bare soil areas (Figure 5c,f,h), it can be seen that this improvement is not so obvious, as even the correction by no-slope classification seems slightly better in the Landsat OLI image from 7 March 2015 ( Figure 5i). This fact may seem evident since, according to previous works, the SCS + C topographic correction model is the appropriated framework for forested scenes [6,15,16]. Regarding this fact, Gu and Gillespie [17] suggested the performance of separate corrections using a sun-canopy-sensor model for forest areas and the C-correction model for non-forest areas [2].…”
Section: Quantitative Validationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, for bare soil areas (Figure 5c,f,h), it can be seen that this improvement is not so obvious, as even the correction by no-slope classification seems slightly better in the Landsat OLI image from 7 March 2015 ( Figure 5i). This fact may seem evident since, according to previous works, the SCS + C topographic correction model is the appropriated framework for forested scenes [6,15,16]. Regarding this fact, Gu and Gillespie [17] suggested the performance of separate corrections using a sun-canopy-sensor model for forest areas and the C-correction model for non-forest areas [2].…”
Section: Quantitative Validationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Topographic correction methods applied in remote sensing comprise cosine, Minnaert, Civco two-stages, statistical-empirical, and Factor C, which have been extensively studied [4][5][6][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can be grouped into three categories based on their degree of complexity and data requirements [7]: simple empirical methods, semi-empirical methods, and physically-based methods. Simple empirical methods are based on band ratios and lack of physical meaning, while physically-based TOC methods perform better but they are complex and require many parameters [8]. Finally, semi-empirical methods consist of a photometric function tuned by an empirical coefficient [9], and they have gained popularity because of their balance between complexity and performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the different bidirectional reflectance distribution functions (BRDFs) of the canopy in inclined and horizontal surfaces, many BRDF-based correction models have been developed [19][20][21], such as the Minnaert correction [22], sun-canopy-sensor (SCS) correction [23,24], SCS + C correction [25], adaptive shade compensation (ASC) model [26], gamma method [27], Sandmeier model [28], Santini model [29], BRDF-based atmospheric and topographic correction (BRATC) model [30], approach based on path length correction (PLC) [31], and the four-scale bidirectional reflection model of slope geometric optical model [32,33]. These BRDF-based correction models have a solid physical basis [34,35]; however, the ill-posed nature of the inverse problem and complicated parameters counteract their advantage in physics and constrain their practical applications [36]. What is more, these models made little progress in removal of the cast shadow in rugged terrains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%