Building a Foundation for Knowledge Co-Creation in Collaborative Water Governance: Dimensions of Stakeholder Networks Facilitated through Bridging Organizations

Abstract

Abstract:The sustainable governance of water resources relies on processes of multi-stakeholder collaborations and interactions that facilitate the sharing and integration of diverse sources and types of knowledge. In this context, it is essential to fully recognize the importance of fostering and enhancing critical connections within and between networks of relationships between different government and non-government agencies, as well as the dynamics that are in support of the development of new knowledge and practices. In Quebec, a network of watershed organizations (WOs) has been put in place to serve as bridging organizations (BOs) for stakeholder groups in their watershed territories. Using the WOs as a case study, this research aims to contribute to a greater understanding of how stakeholder groups can be effectively connected to support knowledge co-creation through networked relationships facilitated by BOs. In line with this overall research aim, the following research objectives are proposed: (1) to assess the quality of the knowledge that is developed and shared through the WOs and their stakeholder networks; (2) to determine the characteristics of stakeholders participating in the WOs' networks that either hinder or support collaborations and knowledge co-creation; (3) to describe the collaborative processes and mechanisms through which the WOs facilitate stakeholder interactions and knowledge co-creation; and (4) to assess the quality of the relationships and interactions between stakeholders participating in the WOs' collaborative networks. A comprehensive literature review is provided of collaborative network dimensions that are in support of knowledge co-creation that forms the foundation of a research framework to assess knowledge co-creation processes that are facilitated through BOs and their collaborative networks. Documented experiences have been gathered through face-to-face semi-structured interviews, as well as a Quebec-wide survey distributed to all WOs and their staff. A total of 41 interviews were conducted, of which nine interviews were with staff members of six selected WOs. Stakeholder perspectives were captured through 33 interviews with diverse stakeholders from three of the six selected WOs. Additionally, interviews were also conducted with five decision makers at the Quebec provincial government level. The findings of this study point to some key challenges and constraints for the effective facilitation of collaboration and knowledge co-creation through the Quebec WOs and their stakeholder networks. Through diverse collaborative mechanisms, most WOs have, to an extent, succeeded in creating opportunities for learning through a renewed sense making of different practices (and related identities) through the development of their watershed master plans, as well as through the facilitation of new communicative connections and translation efforts between diverse stakeholder groups. Key challenges to their effectiveness have been relating to a limited capacity and resources, limited ...

Ecological stakeholder analogs as intermediaries between freshwater biodiversity conservation and sustainable water management

“…The explicit mapping of relationships between ESAs using a network-based approach facilitates such an approach and can be based on ecological similarities (e.g., habitat use and feeding guild), trophic interactions, or taxonomic relatedness. Medema et al (2017) In addition to selecting and prioritizing ESAs based on economic importance and social values, a number of well-established concepts in ecology can be employed to take advantage of the interconnections among ecological factors (i.e., potential ESA), in the same way, decision-makers would normally approach conventional stakeholders. Medema et al (2017) In addition to selecting and prioritizing ESAs based on economic importance and social values, a number of well-established concepts in ecology can be employed to take advantage of the interconnections among ecological factors (i.e., potential ESA), in the same way, decision-makers would normally approach conventional stakeholders.…”

“…Using such a grouping approach for ESA would facilitate research interest in broadening the use of indicators in environmental flows to community-or ecosystem-based metrics (Arthington et al, 2018). Medema et al (2017) emphasized the importance of bridging organizations, which are stakeholder groups that unite suites of stakeholders according to some common interest, even if this interest is outside of the issue under decision. In the context of societal stakeholders, bridging organizations are often created especially for facilitating collaboration and social ties between stakeholders to simplify the decision-making process and increase acceptance of outcomes.…”

Matching Ecosystem Functions with Adaptive Ecosystem Management: Decision Pathways to Overcome Institutional Barriers

“…The relationship of analytical levels of human choice and geographic domains is a welldescribed phenomenon [22,53]. In our case study area, ecosystem management requires actors to negotiate to apply ecological criteria.…”

“…Solutions to improve our ability to protect ecosystem functions in SESs include knowledge co-creation and collaborative governance that facilitate the sharing and integration of diverse sources and types of knowledge [22]. The management-as-learning approaches include the dynamics in a transition due to both internal and contextual factors [23][24][25][26][27] while fit-for-purpose governance strategies focus on dynamic perspectives and strategies [28][29][30]).…”

Socio-Psychological Perspectives on the Potential for Serious Games to Promote Transcendental Values in IWRM Decision-Making

“…Collaborative forms of governance, such as IWRM and AM, are considered essential to solving complex sustainability problems and, as mentioned, require the bridging of various physical, administrative, and socio-political boundaries [14]. Human behavior changes with time, and the advancement of information and communication technologies (ICT) offers innovative means to help span these boundaries and contribute to collaborative solutions to sustainability problems, while fundamentally transforming interactions and relationships between governments, firms, non-government organizations (NGOs), and civil society [15,16].…”