2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijesd.2008.022390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building a 'theory of sustainable development': two salient conceptions within the German discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, a plurality of sometimes strongly differing and even competing meanings has been ascribed to this term (Lafferty and Langhelle 1999;Lélé 1991;Redclift 1992;Schultz et al 2008;Sneddon et al 2006). On the other hand, sustainable development is a term that has been defined only vaguely (e.g., Fergus and Rowney 2005;Kates et al 2005;Robinson 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, a plurality of sometimes strongly differing and even competing meanings has been ascribed to this term (Lafferty and Langhelle 1999;Lélé 1991;Redclift 1992;Schultz et al 2008;Sneddon et al 2006). On the other hand, sustainable development is a term that has been defined only vaguely (e.g., Fergus and Rowney 2005;Kates et al 2005;Robinson 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For almost 30 years, several approaches to conceptualizing sustainable development have been developed and applied, such as the three-or four-pillar model or the cross-pillar integrative approaches [14,15]. The threepillar model prevails in political and scientific practice, despite being criticized for its lack of theoretical depth in justifying sustainable development as overall guiding principle, its systematic neglect of interdependencies between the pillars and insufficient consideration of the postulate of justice and fairness [14,15].…”
Section: The Integrative Concept Of Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threepillar model prevails in political and scientific practice, despite being criticized for its lack of theoretical depth in justifying sustainable development as overall guiding principle, its systematic neglect of interdependencies between the pillars and insufficient consideration of the postulate of justice and fairness [14,15]. The Integrative Concept of Sustainable Development [13] was developed to overcome these deficits.…”
Section: The Integrative Concept Of Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to most sustainability concepts, the basic idea here is to avoid defining sustainable development along 'classic' economic, ecological, and social lines. Instead, the IHSC begins with the constitutive elements of the sustainability overall concept, derived from key documents such as the Brundtland Report, the Rio Declaration, and Agenda 21: (a) the postulate of inter-and intragenerational justice, (b) the global perspective, and (c) the anthropocentric view [19][20][21][22], that are translated into three general goals: to secure human existence, maintain society's productive potential, and preserve society's options for development and action. These goals are further concretized by a set of sustainability rules, such as the satisfaction of basic needs, equal access to education and information, the ability to provide for oneself, the sustainable use of renewable and nonrenewable resources, an adequate development of human and knowledge capital, maintenance of social resources, or the preservation of cultural heritage and cultural diversity.…”
Section: Sustainability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%