Since assuming the Human Resource Development Review (HRDR) editor's role a year ago, I have become more keenly aware of what has been published in the various Human Resource Development (HRD) journals, particularly, those sponsored by and affiliated with the Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD). Throughout the years, HRD scholars have made multiple attempts to analyze publications in our journals to identify trends in HRD research, gaps between research and practice, and opportunities for future scholarship. Most recently, at the University Forum for Human Resource Development (UFHRD) 2018 Conference, held in Newcastle, United Kingdom, I was prompted to think, once again, about HRD scholarship when I listened to the results of a bibliometric mapping study conducted by a team of my HRD colleagues (Beigi, Shirmohammadi, Mehdiabadi, & McLean, 2018). Also, during a conversation with a senior HRD scholar at the UFHRD Conference, I was reminded of the influence an editor has on the scope of topics published in the journal, and subsequently, the HRD field. This editorial was motivated for these reasons, with the hope it will stimulate deep selfreflection on what we produce as researchers, as well as evoke some healthy dialogues about what our scholarship means in the new digital world. In the subsequent three sections, I first highlight historical trends of HRD research by synthesizing analytical work conducted by HRD scholars. Following that, I offer a personal analysis of the HRD challenges facing real-world organizations over the past 5 years. I conclude this editorial by suggesting opportunities HRD scholars can tap to maximize the impact of our scholarly work.