Building COPD care on shaky ground: a mixed methods study from Swedish primary care professional perspective

Abstract

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a public health problem. Interprofessional collaboration and health promotion interventions such as exercise training, education, and behaviour change are cost effective, have a good effect on health status, and are recommended in COPD treatment guidelines. There is a gap between the guidelines and the healthcare available to people with COPD.The aim of this study was to increase the understanding of what shapes the provision of primary care services to people with COPD and what healthcare is offered to them from the perspective of healthcare professionals and managers.MethodsThe study was conducted in primary care in a Swedish county council during January to June 2015. A qualitatively driven mixed methods design was applied. Qualitative and quantitative findings were merged into a joint analysis. Interviews for the qualitative component were performed with healthcare professionals (n = 14) from two primary care centres and analysed with qualitative content analysis. Two questionnaires were used for the quantitative component; one was answered by senior managers or COPD nurses at primary care centres (n = 26) in the county council and the other was answered by healthcare professionals (n = 18) at two primary care centres. The questionnaire data were analysed with descriptive statistics.ResultsThe analysis gave rise to the overarching theme building COPD care on shaky ground. This represents professionals driven to build a supportive COPD care on ‘shaky’ organisational ground in a fragmented and non-compliant healthcare organisation. The shaky ground is further represented by uninformed patients with a complex disease, which is surrounded with shame. The professionals are autonomous and pragmatic, used to taking responsibility for their work, and with limited involvement of the management. They wish to provide high quality COPD care with interprofessional collaboration, but they lack competence and are hindered by inadequate routines and lack of resources.ConclusionsThere is a gap between COPD treatment guidelines and the healthcare that is provided in primary care. To facilitate implementation of the guidelines several actions are needed, such as further training for professionals, additional resources, and improved organisational structure for interprofessional collaboration and patient education.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2393-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Missed diagnosis and overtreatment of COPD among smoking primary care population in Central Greece: old problems persist

“… 63 To facilitate implementation of the guidelines, several actions are needed, such as additional resources, further training for professionals, and improved organizational structure for interprofessional collaboration and patient education. 64 …”

Developing a strategic understanding of telehealth service adoption for COPD care management: A causal loop analysis of healthcare professionals

“…Physicians use it, albeit rarely, in combination with telemetric information for clinical decision making. The decision making process is not based on any single value, such as may be the case in diabetes [60] as COPD patients are multi-morbid, elderly, with a particular social profile [57,61]. Comparing the three CLDs, some variables are present in all of them, while some are unique for a particular HCP.…”

“…For example, nurses observed that they need to better understand the patient's character, which in most cases in COPD care is self-inhibiting. This means that patients with COPD do not like to bother anyone, even if they experience a disease crisis [57]. "Adoption" increased "Adoption (Patient)", which created an indirect reinforcing loop for "Adoption".…”

Improving access to health care for people with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Southern New Zealand: qualitative study of the views of health professional stakeholders and patients

“…Wagner’s chronic care model36 37 underpins many current models of COPD care38 39 with its emphasis on the need for proactive, planned and integrated care across the health system. While there is international13 and NZ40 evidence from randomised clinical trials that integrated disease management for COPD improves patients’ quality of life and reduces hospital admissions, the integration of these models into routine clinical practice remains problematic 41 42. One key problem is fragmentation of care41 and the NZ health system, including the Southern health region,43 44 compares unfavourably with other health systems in terms of the degree of care fragmentation,45 a problem exacerbated by the primary care copayment funding model 43 46.…”

“…While there is international13 and NZ40 evidence from randomised clinical trials that integrated disease management for COPD improves patients’ quality of life and reduces hospital admissions, the integration of these models into routine clinical practice remains problematic 41 42. One key problem is fragmentation of care41 and the NZ health system, including the Southern health region,43 44 compares unfavourably with other health systems in terms of the degree of care fragmentation,45 a problem exacerbated by the primary care copayment funding model 43 46. Our findings of barriers to accessing integrated care (availability, affordability, appropriateness and ability to pay) are consistent with this literature.…”