2010
DOI: 10.3390/rs2092111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Damage Estimation by Integration of Seismic Intensity Information and Satellite L-band SAR Imagery

Abstract: For a quick and stable estimation of earthquake damaged buildings worldwide, using Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) loaded on the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) satellite, a model combining the usage of satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery and Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)-scale seismic intensity is proposed. In order to expand the existing C-band SAR based damage estimation model into L-band SAR, this paper rebuilds a likelihood function for severe damage ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because remote sensing images, especially those with high resolutions, may be the only currently practical and reliable tools that are capable of providing full, clear and detailed coverage of large areas when labor resources and work times are limited, this information is urgently needed. Recently, apart from applications in post-earthquake impact assessments [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], many studies have addressed the application of high-resolution remote sensing technology to pre-earthquake exposure, vulnerability, and risk. In these pre-earthquake studies, the and/or -relevant issues (see Equation (1)) of various buildings were widely discussed, including various optical imagery-based specific analyses (Table 1) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], some attempts at fusing optical imagery and LiDAR or SAR data [51][52][53] to help extract the heights of buildings, and several comprehensive reviews [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because remote sensing images, especially those with high resolutions, may be the only currently practical and reliable tools that are capable of providing full, clear and detailed coverage of large areas when labor resources and work times are limited, this information is urgently needed. Recently, apart from applications in post-earthquake impact assessments [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], many studies have addressed the application of high-resolution remote sensing technology to pre-earthquake exposure, vulnerability, and risk. In these pre-earthquake studies, the and/or -relevant issues (see Equation (1)) of various buildings were widely discussed, including various optical imagery-based specific analyses (Table 1) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], some attempts at fusing optical imagery and LiDAR or SAR data [51][52][53] to help extract the heights of buildings, and several comprehensive reviews [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dense urban area, z-values from Sentinel-1 DPM are higher, whereas in the middle of the town, where vegetation is dominant, the z-values are considerably higher in the ALOS-2 DPM. This is mainly because of the wavelength characteristics of the C-band and L-band, which have different permeabilities and permittivities over the various objects [27,30]. Figure 12 shows a topographic profile (SRTM 30 m), with the aim of revealing any potential correlations between the topography and DPMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is no straightforward SAR method that meets the needs of users or strategy makers. The existing methods vary from region to region, due to differences in local parameters such as vegetation, topography, or building performance [7,8,11,18,22,27]. None of the studies discussed in Section 1 has focused on a combination of dual-polarized SAR intensity and dual-polarized SAR coherence together with discriminant analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of previous L-band SARs, JERS-1, and ALOS, multi-temporal analyses could distinguish the damaged city blocks in the same manner as the higher-frequency SARs [17][18][19]. The latest L-band SAR satellite ALOS-2 has been observing the Earth since 2014 [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%