Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects

Porwal, Atul; Hewage, Kasun

doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.004

Cited by 387 publications

(268 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

261

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, although the contractors held most long-term partnerships (Table 2), they were not necessarily the 'centre' of BIM-based collaboration. The contractors -through their commercial decisionsinfluenced their partners' BIM adoption and investment, an evidence against Porwal and Hewage (2013) who claimed that BIM maturity and adoption mainly depend on clients. Ackoff (1970) and Mintzberg, Lambe, Brian Quinn, and Ghoshal (1996) divided corporate planning into strategic, tactical, and operational levels and addressed the danger of detaching top management from tactical decisions and work floor operations (Mintzberg et al, 1996).…”

Section: Intra-organizational Conditions Of Bim-enabled Sc Partnershipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…BIM adoption and implementation have been previously associated with client-or demand-driven partnering structures for asset delivery, such as public-private partnerships (PPP) (Love, Liu, Matthews, Sing, & Smith, 2015;Porwal & Hewage, 2013). As PPPs represent project-specific delivery methods, they hardly extend across multiple tiers and beyond projects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM

Papadonikolaki

Wamelink

2017

Building Research & Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digitizing buildings via building information modelling (BIM) is increasingly gaining traction in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) sector. The plethora of BIM-based technologies affects both inter-and intra-organizational relations. Structured inter-organizational networks across tiers, such as supply chain (SC) partnerships were used to examine how BIM affects these changing relations across and within firms' boundaries. Empirical explorations around the interplay between BIM and SC partnering -as a proxy for supply chain management (SCM) philosophywere deployed to assess their contribution to SC integration, and to investigate the functions of key actors in AEC. One young and one long-standing SC partnership were studied, and it was observed that the contractual arrangements had to be complemented by well-defined BIM scope, and communications across multiple tiers to built trust and support collaboration in the network. There were two types of BIM-enabled SC partnering: with emphasis on either transactions or relations, the former being merely operational whereas the latter strategic. These interorganizational orientations of BIM-enabled SC partnering outlined further intra-organizational conditions for integration regarding functional division, business models and services offered. The study carries implications for BIM and SCM researchers, policy-makers and practitioners, and proposes strategies for SC integration by aligning intra-with inter-organizational relations.

show abstract

Section: Intra-organizational Conditions Of Bim-enabled Sc Partnershipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM

Papadonikolaki

Wamelink

2017

Building Research & Information

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Table 2 shows a summary of the factors identified in the literature review. Eastman et al 2008;Post 2008;Young et al 2008;Yan, Damian 2008;Hartmann, Fischer 2008;Arayici et al 2009Arayici et al , 2011Sacks, Barak 2010;Singh et al 2011;Gerber et al 2011;Nejat et al 2012;Gledson et al 2012;Giel, Issa 2013;Eadie et al 2013;Porwal, Hewage 2013;Zhang, Gao 2013;Migilinskas et al 2013;Volk et al 2014 19 2 Lack of data interoperability (T5) Bernstein, Pittman 2004;Eastman et al 2008;Post 2008;McAdam 2010;Azhar et al 2011;Kim, Anderson 2012;McAuley et al 2012;Rezgui et al 2013;Porwal, Hewage 2013;Aram et al 2013;Migilinskas et al 2013;Gupta et al 2014;Dong et al 2014;Miettinen, Paavola 2014;Volk et al 2014;Cao et al 2015 No. Factors Reference Sum 3 Changes in workflows and inappropriate business models (M4) Bernstein, Pittman 2004;Howell, Batcheler 2004;Méndez 2006;Gilligan, Kunz 2007;Gu et al 2007;…”

Section: Summary Of Factors Identified In the Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Literature Review of the Factors Limiting the Application of Bim in the Construction Industry

Sun

Jiang

Skibniewski

et al. 2015

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

173

147

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Building Information Modeling (BIM) has had a profound effect on the construction industry. It has greatly improved coordination among stakeholders, enhanced productivity, and increased profits. However, many factors still limit the application of BIM in the construction industry. This study conducts a literature review to identify these negative factors. Firstly, twenty-two sub-factors are identified and classified into five categories: Technology, Cost, Management, Personnel, and Legal. Secondly, some suggestions for eliminating these limiting factors are given. Finally, the study also identifies further research directions for improving BIM theory and applying BIM technology widely and successfully. The results of this study will provide support for practitioners who are using or plan to use BIM.

show abstract

“…It becomes important in public sector to review and evaluate the current performance of all processes, to ensure the public sector obtaining a greater value for the money in their construction projects [6].…”

Section: Bim In the Public Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution to the Study of Collaborative Working in BIM-Based Projects in the Context of Public Works

Miceli¹,

Teixeira²,

Pellanda³

2017

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The great development of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in recent years, especially network-based and cloud-based technologies, has led to a significant increase in efficiency of Building Information Modelling (BIM) platforms, which motivated a radical change in project managing in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) companies through implementation of collaborative working environments. However, the methodology used for implementing all the involved concepts has a direct influence on the results in terms of quality of AEC projects and efficiency in their development process. This paper focuses on the similarities and differences between two collaborative arrangements for BIM adoption in AEC projects, with a view to choosing best practices for civil construction works management and inspection offices in the context of public works in the Brazilian federal government. The first arrangement uses software from the same developer and proprietary formats, while the second uses software from different developers and formats suitable for interoperability between them. Based on the results, this work points out the limitations, advantages and disadvantages of using both arrangements, indicating research perspectives for industry and academia.

show abstract

Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects

Cited by 387 publications

References 8 publications

Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM

Inter- and intra-organizational conditions for supply chain integration with BIM

A Literature Review of the Factors Limiting the Application of Bim in the Construction Industry

Contribution to the Study of Collaborative Working in BIM-Based Projects in the Context of Public Works

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About