2002
DOI: 10.1080/09650790200200180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building purposeful action: action methods and action research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the strategies of the program were presented according to the opinions of the experts in the nominal group in nine paragraphs (Table 1). After completing the translation and adaptation process, a eld experiment was performed in order to receive comments and feedback from different users to determine the appropriateness of a concept in a particular eld [32,33].The rst module, which included one preliminary session and four intervention sessions (Table 2), was performed by ve peers for seven pregnant (aged 20-28 weeks) mothers, who had a score above 13 in the Edinburgh instrument and were considered as depressed. The mothers were then asked open-ended questions about the program's acceptability and comprehensibility, as well as the service providers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the strategies of the program were presented according to the opinions of the experts in the nominal group in nine paragraphs (Table 1). After completing the translation and adaptation process, a eld experiment was performed in order to receive comments and feedback from different users to determine the appropriateness of a concept in a particular eld [32,33].The rst module, which included one preliminary session and four intervention sessions (Table 2), was performed by ve peers for seven pregnant (aged 20-28 weeks) mothers, who had a score above 13 in the Edinburgh instrument and were considered as depressed. The mothers were then asked open-ended questions about the program's acceptability and comprehensibility, as well as the service providers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional approaches to field-testing concepts have focused on attempts to use consultative processes, such as participatory action research, which seek opinions and feedback from a variety of concept users, usually to determine the state of play in a particular context and to bring a form of creative consensus to bear through dialogue (Carter, 2002;Kezar & Maxey, 2016). Action research in this context is a problem-driven approach, with a real-world issue being the motivation for enquiry.…”
Section: Field-testing the Reconceptualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not a pilot study but a field-test of the intervention. While the two terms are often used interchangeably, field-testing does not involve the collection of data to provide an quantitative analysis of the validity or effectiveness of an instrument or intervention, rather it is meant to seek opinions and feedback from a variety of users, usually to determine the appropriateness of a concept in a particular context [30,31].…”
Section: Phase 2: Field-testingmentioning
confidence: 99%